ArticleRadiological physics and technology2025
Optimization of image shoot timing for cerebral veins 3D-digital subtraction angiography by interventional angiography systems.
Article in Radiological physics and technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Direct 3D rotational venography: Insights in optimizing visualization.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
3D-digital subtraction angiography (3D-DSA) is essential for understanding the anatomical structure of cerebral veins, crucial in brain tumor surgery. 3D-DSA produces three-dimensional images of veins by adjusting the X-ray delay time after contrast agent injection, but the delineation of veins varies with the delay in X-ray timing. Our study aimed to refine the delay time using time-enhancement curve (TEC) analysis from 2D-DSA conducted before 3D-DSA imaging. We retrospectively reviewed 26 meningioma patients who underwent cerebral angiography from March 2020 to August 2021. Using 2D-DSA, we analyzed arterial and venous TECs to determine the contrast agent's peak time and estimated the optimal imaging timing. Cases performed near this optimal time were in Group A, and others in Group B, with cerebral venous pixel values compared between them. TEC analysis identified peak times: internal carotid artery: 2.8 ± 0.7 s, middle cerebral artery (M4): 4.1 ± 0.9 s, superior sagittal sinus: 8.3 ± 1.1 s, sigmoid sinus: 9.5 ± 1.3 s, and venous structures near tumors: 7.3 ± 1.0 s. We observed several veins peaking immediately after arterial contrast passage, suggesting the optimal X-ray delay should incorporate the arterial contrast agent's transit time. Statistical analysis revealed that Group A, with imaging timed to reflect the contrast agent transit time, demonstrated significantly better contrast effects than Group B. The X-ray delay time for 3D-DSA imaging of cerebral veins can be optimized in angiography systems by incorporating the contrast agent transit time, calculated from TEC analysis of cerebral 2D-DSA images.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.