ReviewCurrent urology reports2024
Current and Future Directions of Technology in Assessment of Peyronie's Disease.
Review in Current urology reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewThis review assesses the effectiveness of various imaging modalities for diagnosing and managing Peyronie's disease (PD), exploring their clinical utility and limitations. RECENT
findingsUltrasonography, currently the only modality endorsed by the American Urological Association, effectively detects calcifications and assesses vascular status but struggles with identifying non-palpable plaques. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging provide detailed anatomical views but are costly along with other deterring factors. Autophotography and 3-dimensional imaging offer convenient home assessments but with variable accuracy. Elastography improves upon traditional ultrasonography, while emerging AI technologies show promise for automating precise curvature assessments, pending further validation. A combined approach tailored to each individual patient based on their needs enhances diagnostic accuracy. Supplementing ultrasonography with elastography and potentially AI could improve diagnostic outcomes and better guide treatment decisions. Continued research is vital to integrate these advancements into standard clinical practice and develop updated standardized protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39470953What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.