Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39470927›Full record

ArticleJournal of computer-aided molecular design2024

Computational Identification and Illustrative Standard for Representation of Unimolecular G-Quadruplex Secondary Structures (CIIS-GQ).

Tugay Direk, Osman Doluca

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computer-aided molecular design, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tugay DirekDepartment of Software Engineering, Izmir University of Economics, İzmir, Turkey.
Osman DolucaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Izmir University of Economics, İzmir, Turkey. osman.doluca@ieu.edu.tr.

Funding

Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumu 216S854
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

G-quadruplexes refer to a large group of nucleic acid-based structures. In recent years, they have been attracting attention due to their biological roles in the telomeres and promoter regions. These structures show wide diversity in topology, however, development of methods for structural classification of G-quadruplexes has been evaded for a long time. There has been a limited number of studies aiming to bring forth a secondary structure classification method. The situation was even more complex than imagined, since the discovery of bulged and mismatched G-quadruplexes while most of the available tools fail to distinguish these non-canonical G-quadruplex motifs. Moreover, the interpretation of their analysis output still requires expert knowledge. In this study, we propose a new method for identification of unimolecular G-Quadruplexes and classification by secondary structures based on three-dimensional structural data. Briefly, coordinates of guanines are processed to identify tetrads, loops and bulges. Then, we present the secondary structure in the form of a depiction which shows the loop types, bulges, and guanines that participate in each tetrad. Moreover, CIIS-GQ identifies non-guanine nucleotides that joins the G-tetrads and forms multiplets. Finally, the results of our study are compared with DSSR and ElTetrado classification methods, and the advantages of the proposed depiction method for representing secondary structures were discussed. The source code of the method can be accessed via https://github.com/TugayDirek/CIIS-GQ .

Indexed as

G-QuadruplexesNucleic Acid ConformationComputational BiologyDNAGuanineHumansModels, MolecularTelomereDNAGuanineBulgeClassification of G-quadruplexesG-quadruplexG-TetradLoopSecondary structures

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.