Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39470917›Full record

Observational studyClinical rheumatology2024

Gout diagnoses uncertain when made by general practitioners without serum uric acid testing: an observational study.

Hein Janssens, Lisanne Houtappels, Tjard Schermer

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Clinical rheumatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hein JanssensDepartment of Primary and Community Care, Radboudumc Research Institute for Medical Innovation, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. hein.janssens@radboudumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2101-6493
Lisanne HoutappelsDepartment of Primary and Community Care, Radboudumc Research Institute for Medical Innovation, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Tjard SchermerDepartment of Primary and Community Care, Radboudumc Research Institute for Medical Innovation, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveGeneral practitioners (GPs) diagnose the majority of all gout patients. They make their diagnosis clinically. Serum uric acid (SUA) level >0.35mmol/l is largely determinative for the clinical diagnosis of gout. We aimed to assess to what extent GPs test SUA when making a first gout diagnosis, and to consider consequences regarding diagnostic certainty of not testing it.

methodsWe calculated proportions of patients from 87 Dutch general practices (1-1-2013 to 1-1-2022) with a first gout diagnosis and a recorded SUA test, evaluated if SUA testing was punctually timed with respect to the diagnosis date, whether SUA levels were >0.35 mmol/L, and whether diagnoses corresponded with diagnoses according to the 'Acute Gout Diagnosis Rule' (AGD-rule).

resultsIn 43.0% of 7782 patients (mean age 64.4 years; 68.8% male) no SUA test result was recorded, with substantial variation among practices: median 41.9% (IQR 20.2%). 'Gout very likely' according to the AGD-rule was seen in all males and in 83.1% of females when a punctually timed SUA >0.35 mmol/L was present. When such SUA level was lacking, 'Questionable or indeterminate gout diagnosis' was seen in all males and in 67.1% of females, and 'Arthritis diagnosis other than gout' in 32.9% of females.

conclusionGPs diagnosed gout without testing SUA in ~40% of cases. This implies avoidable diagnostic uncertainty with impact for the clinical care of many patients as well as for studies that include primary care patients with gout. Key Points • Serum uric acid (SUA) level > 0.35 mmol is determinative when diagnosing gout: however, it is unknown how often SUA testing is applied as such. • More than 40% of patients with a first gout diagnosis according to general practitioners (GPs) had no SUA test result registered in their medical record. • Gout diagnosing by GPs without SUA testing appeared to lead to avoidable diagnostic uncertainty, as diagnoses are often questionable or sometimes even wrong. • Researchers investigating gout need to take into account diagnostic uncertainty if they include gout patients who are diagnosed in primary care in their studies without SUA information.

Indexed as

General PractitionersGoutUric AcidAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsUncertaintyUric AcidDiagnosisDiagnostic ruleGeneral practitionerGoutPrimary careSerum urate

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.