ArticleOral radiology2025
Style harmonization of panoramic radiography using deep learning.
Article in Oral radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Current evidence of generative artificial intelligence specifically developed for dental and maxillofacial radiology: a systematic review.Dento maxillo facial radiology · 2026Pooled it
- Transformer and generative models in dental and maxillofacial imaging: Narrative review of clinical evidence and future directions.Imaging science in dentistry · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed to harmonize panoramic radiograph images from different equipment in a single institution to display similar styles.
methodsA total of 15,624 panoramic images were acquired using two different equipment: 8079 images from Rayscan Alpha Plus (R-unit) and 7545 images from Pax-i plus (P-unit). Among these, 222 image pairs (444 images) from the same patients comprised the test dataset to harmonize the P-unit images with the R-unit image style using CycleGAN. Objective evaluations included Frechet Inception Distance (FID) and Learned Perceptual Image Patch Similarity (LPIPS) assessments. Additionally, expert evaluation was conducted by two oral and maxillofacial radiologists on transformed P-unit and R-unit images. The statistical analysis of LPIPS employed a Student's t-test.
resultsThe FID and mean LPIPS values of the transformed P-unit images (7.362, 0.488) were lower than those of the original P-unit images (8.380, 0.519), with a significant difference in LPIPS (p < 0.05). The experts evaluated 43.3-46.7% of the transformed P-unit images as R-unit images, 20.0-28.3% as P-units, and 28.3-33.3% as undetermined images.
conclusionsCycleGAN has the potential to harmonize panoramic radiograph image styles. Enhancement of the model is anticipated for the application of images produced by additional units.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39470914What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.