ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2025
Society of Surgical Oncology Consensus Statement: Assessing the Evidence for and Utility of Gene Expression Profiling of Primary Cutaneous Melanoma.
Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improving Risk Stratification for SLNB in Elderly Patients With Melanoma: The SENTINOLD Nomogram.International journal of dermatology · 2026Article
- Sentinel lymph node biopsy in melanoma: pathologic evaluation and diagnostic considerations.Journal of pathology and translational medicine · 2026Article
- Review
- Patterns and Predictors of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Utilization in High- and Low-Risk Thin Melanomas.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Gene Expression Profile-Based Tests in Melanoma: What Factors Really Matter and How Do We Evaluate Them?Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Surgical Management of Stage IV Melanoma: Clinical, Molecular, and Therapeutic Considerations.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Melanoma: Overview and Updates.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Key Biomarker Correlations in Cutaneous Melanoma: Implications for Diagnostic, Prognostic, and Therapeutic Strategies-A Retrospective Single-Centered Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Review
- Adjuvant Immunotherapy in Stage IIB/IIC Melanoma: Current Evidence and Future Directions.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Validation of risk prediction models for sentinel lymph node metastasis in melanoma in a high UV index region.JAAD international · 2025Article
- Long Live the Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Primary Cutaneous Melanoma.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionGene expression profiling (GEP) of primary cutaneous melanoma aims to offer prognostic and predictive information to guide clinical care. Despite limited evidence of clinical utility, these tests are increasingly incorporated into clinical care.
methodsA panel of melanoma experts from the Society of Surgical Oncology convened to develop recommendations regarding the use of GEP to guide management of patients with melanoma. The use of currently available GEP tests were evaluated in three clinical scenarios: (1) the utility in patient selection for sentinel lymph node biopsy; (2) the utility to guide surveillance; and (3) the utility to inform adjuvant therapy. As a basis for these recommendations, the panel performed a systematic review of the literature, including articles published from January 2012 until August 2023.
resultsAfter review of 137 articles, 50 met the inclusion criteria. These articles included evidence related to three available GEP tests: 31-GEP, CP-GEP, and 11-GEP. The consensus recommendations were finalized using a modified Delphi process. The panel found that current evidence often fails to account for known clinicopathologic risk factors and lacks high-level data. The panel recognizes that the study of GEP tests is still evolving. The integration of GEP into routine clinical practice for predicting sentinel lymph node status and patient prognosis in melanoma is therefore not currently recommended.
conclusionAt present, GEP should be considered primarily an investigational tool, ideally used in the context of clinical trials or specialized research settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.