SynthesisInflammopharmacology2025
Cyclosporin for the treatment of Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN): a systematic review of observational studies and clinical trials focusing on single therapy, combination therapy, and comparative assessments.
Synthesis in Inflammopharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Emerging treatments for dermatologic diseases in infants, children, and adolescents: a systematic review of clinical trials on biologics and small molecule inhibitors.Inflammopharmacology · 2025Pooled it
- The Use of Systemic Immunomodulating Drugs and Management Practices in Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis among Dermatologists in the Philippines: A Cross-sectional Survey Study.Acta dermato-venereologica · 2026Article
- Fulminant toxic epidermal necrolysis induced by pucotenlimab in a patient with lung adenocarcinoma: a case report.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Sintilimab-induced toxic epidermal necrolysis complicated in advanced gastric cancer: a case report and literature review.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundStevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) are rare, severe, and potentially life-threatening skin and mucous membrane disorders. They are characterized by widespread skin and mucosal detachment and necrosis, and are classified based on the percentage of total body surface area (TBSA) affected. Given the severe and often life-threatening nature of these conditions, the identification and implementation of effective treatments is crucial. Notably, cyclosporin has demonstrated efficacy in managing these challenging conditions.
methodsA systematic search was carried out through the PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases until May 2024. Additionally, a manual search was conducted through the reference lists of the included studies to minimize the risk of missing reports.
resultsOverall, 17 studies involving 4761 patients were included in our analysis. The majority of the included studies suggested favorable outcomes for the use of cyclosporin in SJS/TEN patients. The use of cyclosporin was associated with improved survival rates, early arrest of disease progression, faster re-epithelialization, reduced length of hospital stays, and lower rates of multi-organ failure. However, a few studies did not find a survival advantage with cyclosporin and even reported an increased risk of mortality, as well as an increased TBSA detachment and risk of infection.
conclusionMost studies indicate positive outcomes with cyclosporin treatment in SJS/TEN patients. This is likely due to cyclosporin's immunomodulatory properties, which may help attenuate the severe inflammatory response associated with these conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39470865What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.