ArticleEuropean radiology2025
SPINEPS-automatic whole spine segmentation of T2-weighted MR images using a two-phase approach to multi-class semantic and instance segmentation.
Article in European radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automated Setup of CT-Based Vertebral Finite Element Simulations: Quantifying the Influence of Boundary-Condition Components on Fracture-Load Estimates.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Reconstruction from multi-planar MRI with foundation models for uterine fibroid analysis.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- VIBESegmentator: full body MRI segmentation for the NAKO and UK Biobank.European radiology · 2026Article
- Spinal disease image segmentation technology integrating U-ResNet and shape-aware attention.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Zero-Shot Vertebral Instance Segmentation on DICOM Spine Radiographs Using Promptable Segment Anything Models.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Anatomy-guided context-aware deep learning for lumbar degenerative disease grading and burden-aware risk assessment on MRI.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Controlled comparative study of YOLOv8-Pose, YOLOv11-Pose, and Detectron2 for vertebrae detection and keypoint estimation.PloS one · 2026Article
- The Duke University Cervical Spine MRI Segmentation Dataset (CSpineSeg).Scientific data · 2025Article
- Research hotspots and trends of pediatric bone age: A bibliometric and visualization analysis.Lasers in medical science · 2025Article
- A Muscle-Driven Spine Model for Predictive Simulations in the Design of Spinal Implants and Lumbar Orthoses.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Automatic segmentation of spinal cord lesions in MS: A robust tool for axial T2-weighted MRI scans.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- From MRI to FEM: an automated pipeline for biomechanical simulations of vertebrae and intervertebral discs.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesIntroducing SPINEPS, a deep learning method for semantic and instance segmentation of 14 spinal structures (ten vertebra substructures, intervertebral discs, spinal cord, spinal canal, and sacrum) in whole-body sagittal T2-weighted turbo spin echo images. MATERIAL AND
methodsThis local ethics committee-approved study utilized a public dataset (train/test 179/39 subjects, 137 female), a German National Cohort (NAKO) subset (train/test 1412/65 subjects, mean age 53, 694 female), and an in-house dataset (test 10 subjects, mean age 70, 5 female). SPINEPS is a semantic segmentation model, followed by a sliding window approach utilizing a second model to create instance masks from the semantic ones. Segmentation evaluation metrics included the Dice score and average symmetrical surface distance (ASSD). Statistical significance was assessed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.
resultsOn the public dataset, SPINEPS outperformed a nnUNet baseline on every structure and metric (e.g., an average over vertebra instances: dice 0.933 vs 0.911, p < 0.001, ASSD 0.21 vs 0.435, p < 0.001). SPINEPS trained on automated annotations of the NAKO achieves an average global Dice score of 0.918 on the combined NAKO and in-house test split. Adding the training data from the public dataset outperforms this (average instance-wise Dice score over the vertebra substructures 0.803 vs 0.778, average global Dice score 0.931 vs 0.918).
conclusionSPINEPS offers segmentation of 14 spinal structures in T2w sagittal images. It provides a semantic mask and an instance mask separating the vertebrae and intervertebral discs. This is the first publicly available algorithm to enable this segmentation. KEY POINTS: Question No publicly available automatic approach can yield semantic and instance segmentation masks for the whole spine (including posterior elements) in T2-weighted sagittal TSE images. Findings Segmenting semantically first and then instance-wise outperforms a baseline trained directly on instance segmentation. The developed model produces high-resolution MRI segmentations for the whole spine. Clinical relevance This study introduces an automatic approach to whole spine segmentation, including posterior elements, in arbitrary fields of view T2w sagittal MR images, enabling easy biomarker extraction, automatic localization of pathologies and degenerative diseases, and quantifying analyses as downstream research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.