ArticleDer Nervenarzt2024
[Guideline-recommended standardized instruments in multiple sclerosis : A comparative content analysis based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF)].
Article in Der Nervenarzt, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Experiences of People with Multiple Sclerosis in Sensor-Based Jump Assessment.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGuidelines serve as practice-based decision support and recommend the use of standardized instruments to measure functional capacity in individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS). However, the extent to which a person's functioning is captured by these instruments is unclear.
objectivesThe aim of this study is to link the content of the MS disease guideline with the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) in order to capture the distribution of the content on the functional domains and contextual factors and to uncover existing gaps. MATERIALS AND
methodsInstruments of the S2k guideline "Diagnosis and therapy of multiple sclerosis, neuromyelitis optica spectrum diseases and MOG-IgG-associated diseases", which were available free of charge in German or English and designed for adult people, were included. The instruments were classified into their meaningful concepts (meaningful concepts = MCs) and subsequently coded using standardized ICF rules by two raters.
resultsThe 23 included instruments contained 351 items and 718 MCs. Of these, 663 MCs could be linked to the ICF according to the coding rules. Of these, 51% (340 MCs) related to body functions, 44% (291 MCs) to the activity and participation component, and 5% (32 MCs) to environmental factors. The most frequently coded chapter was mobility (d4) with 201 MCs. Interrater agreement was k = 0.79. DISCUSSION: The linking of the guideline-recommended instruments to the ICF shows that the instruments cover different themes. The area of environmental factors is underrepresented. The ICF linkage reveals a broad spectrum of functioning covered by the guideline-recommended instruments and facilitates the selection of appropriate instruments for the affected persons.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.