ArticleNucleic acids research2024
Spatial pattern and differential expression analysis with spatial transcriptomic data.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- STcompare: comparative spatial transcriptomics data analysis of structurally matched tissues to characterize differentially spatially patterned genes.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- DESpace2: detection of differential spatial patterns in spatial omics data.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- The applications of single-cell and spatial transcriptomics in neuroscience and brain disorders.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2026Review
- Logistic regression for estimating functional effects with spatial transcriptomics.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Voyager: exploratory single-cell genomics data analysis with geospatial statistics.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The emergence of spatial transcriptomic technologies has opened new avenues for investigating gene activities while preserving the spatial context of tissues. Utilizing data generated by such technologies, the identification of spatially variable (SV) genes is an essential step in exploring tissue landscapes and biological processes. Particularly in typical experimental designs, such as case-control or longitudinal studies, identifying SV genes between groups is crucial for discovering significant biomarkers or developing targeted therapies for diseases. However, current methods available for analyzing spatial transcriptomic data are still in their infancy, and none of the existing methods are capable of identifying SV genes between groups. To overcome this challenge, we developed SPADE for spatial pattern and differential expression analysis to identify SV genes in spatial transcriptomic data. SPADE is based on a machine learning model of Gaussian process regression with a gene-specific Gaussian kernel, enabling the detection of SV genes both within and between groups. Through benchmarking against existing methods in extensive simulations and real data analyses, we demonstrated the preferred performance of SPADE in detecting SV genes within and between groups. The SPADE source code and documentation are publicly available at https://github.com/thecailab/SPADE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.