Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39470716›Full record

Trial reportJMIR formative research2024

Development of the Happy Hands Self-Management App for People with Hand Osteoarthritis: Feasibility Study.

Anne Therese Tveter, Cecilie Varsi, Marit Kristin Maarnes, Stein Jarle Pedersen, Barbara S Christensen, Thale Beate Blanck, Sissel B Nyheim, Tim Pelle, Ingvild Kjeken

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JMIR formative research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05150171 (Usability of an E-self-management Program for Treatment of Hand Osteoarthritis - the Happy Hands Pilot Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05150171 nacompletednot on this map

Usability of an E-self-management Program for Treatment of Hand Osteoarthritis - the Happy Hands Pilot Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorDiakonhjemmet HospitalRan2021 to 2022Enrolled72ConditionsHand OsteoarthritisArmse-self-management intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Anne Therese TveterHealth Service Research and Innovation Unit, Center for Treatment of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases (REMEDY), Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-1701-9835
Cecilie VarsiFaculty of Health and Social Sciences, University of South-Eastern Norway, Drammen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-5257-7993
Marit Kristin MaarnesUnit for Clinical Activity, Division of Medical Services, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0009-0009-2049-6756
Stein Jarle PedersenFaculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0009-0009-5587-5350
Barbara S ChristensenDivision of Rheumatology and Research, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0009-0009-3469-346X
Thale Beate BlanckHealth Service Research and Innovation Unit, Center for Treatment of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases (REMEDY), Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0009-0008-5544-3737
Sissel B NyheimNorwegian Rheumatism Association, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0009-0006-4926-3081
Tim PelleDepartment of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6862-5910
Ingvild KjekenHealth Service Research and Innovation Unit, Center for Treatment of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases (REMEDY), Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-3971-2852

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient education, hand exercises, and the use of assistive devices are recommended as first-line treatments for individuals with hand osteoarthritis (OA). However, the quality of care services for this patient group is suboptimal in primary care.

objectiveThe overarching goal was to develop and evaluate feasibility of an app-based self-management intervention for people with hand OA. This feasibility study aims to assess self-reported usability and satisfaction, change in outcomes and quality-of-care, exercise adherence and patients' experiences using the app.

methodsThe development and feasibility testing followed the first 2 phases of the Medical Research Council framework for the development and evaluation of complex interventions and were conducted in close collaboration with patient research partners (PRPs). A 3-month pre-post mixed methods design was used to evaluate feasibility. Men and women over 40 years of age diagnosed with painful, symptomatic hand OA were recruited. Usability was assessed using the System Usability Scale (0-100), while satisfaction, usefulness, pain, and stiffness were evaluated using a numeric rating scale (NRS score from 0 to 10). The activity performance of the hand was measured using the Measure of Activity Performance of the Hand (MAP-Hand) (1-4), grip strength was assessed with a Jamar dynamometer (kg), and self-reported quality of care was evaluated using the Osteoarthritis Quality Indicator questionnaire (0-100). Participants were deemed adherent if they completed at least 2 exercise sessions per week for a minimum of 8 weeks. Focus groups were conducted to explore participants' experiences using the app. Changes were analyzed using a paired sample t test (mean change and 95% CI), with the significance level set at P<.05.

resultsThe first version of the Happy Hands app was developed based on the needs and requirements of the PRPs, evidence-based treatment recommendations, and the experiences of individuals living with hand OA. The app was designed to guide participants through a series of informational videos, exercise videos, questionnaires, quizzes, and customized feedback over a 3-month period. The feasibility study included 71 participants (mean age 64 years, SD 8; n=61, 86%, women), of whom 57 (80%) completed the assessment after 3 months. Usability (mean 91.5 points, SD 9.2 points), usefulness (median 8, IQR 7-10), and satisfaction (median 8, IQR 7-10) were high. Significant improvements were observed in self-reported quality of care (36.4 points, 95% CI 29.7-43.1, P<.001), grip strength (right: 2.9 kg, 95% CI 1.7-4.1; left: 3.2 kg, 95% CI 1.9-4.6, P<.001), activity performance (0.18 points, 95% CI 0.11-0.25, P<.001), pain (1.7 points, 95% CI 1.2-2.2, P<.001), and stiffness (1.9 points, 95% CI 1.3-2.4, P=.001) after 3 months. Of the 71 participants, 53 (75%) were adherent to the exercise program. The focus groups supported these results and led to the implementation of several enhancements in the second version of the app.

conclusionsThe app-based self-management intervention was deemed highly usable and useful by patients. The results further indicated that the intervention may improve quality of care, grip strength, activity performance, pain, and stiffness. However, definitive conclusions need to be confirmed in a powered randomized controlled trial.

trial registrationNCT05150171.

Indexed as

Feasibility StudiesMobile ApplicationsOsteoarthritisSelf-ManagementAdultAgedFemaleHandHand JointsHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Satisfactionactivity performanceapp developmentbehavior changedesigneHealthfirst-line treatmenthand exerciseshome exercisemHealthOsteoarthritissatisfactionself-managementsocial cognitive theoryusefulness

Identifiers

PMID39470716
PMCPMC11558211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.