Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39470685›Full record

ArticleJournal of surgical oncology2025

Treatment Modalities and Risks of Complication for Patients With Localized Renal Cell Carcinoma Aged 75 and Older.

Chalairat Suk-Ouichai, Hiten D Patel, Kent T Sato, Shilajit D Kundu, Ashley E Ross, Kent T Perry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of surgical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chalairat Suk-OuichaiDepartment of Urology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3175-0886
Hiten D PatelDepartment of Urology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4028-010X
Kent T SatoDepartment of Radiology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Shilajit D KunduDepartment of Urology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Ashley E RossDepartment of Urology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Kent T PerryDepartment of Urology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Funding

The authors received no specific funding for this work.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesPartial (PN)/radical (RN) nephrectomy is the standard treatment for localized renal-cell carcinoma (RCC). The potential risks of these procedures are concerns for the elderly. We evaluated perioperative outcomes/survival for patients aged ≥ 75 years with localized RCC who underwent PN, RN, or thermal ablation (TA).

methodsLocalized RCC patients undergoing PN/RN/TA (2000-2023) were retrospectively reviewed. Logistic-regression assessed factors associated with major complications. Kaplan-Meier estimated survival.

resultsA total of 278 patients (≥ 75 years) with RCC who received intervention (107RN, 101PN, and 70TA) were identified. Median age was 78 years. PN patients were younger than other cohorts (77 vs. 79, p = 0.006). Patients with cancer comorbidities underwent TA than PN/RN (93% vs. 88%/76%, respectively). Median tumor size was 4.0, 3.0, and 2.6 cm in RN, PN, and TA cohorts, respectively. RN patients had more complex masses compared to other cohorts (9 vs. 7, p < 0.001). Postoperative complications were significantly greater among PN patients (p = 0.03), but there was no significant difference in Clavien ≥ 3 complications. Peripheral vascular disease (PVD) was associated with Clavien ≥ 3 complications on multivariable analysis (p = 0.03). RN was performed at a stable rate while PN decreased in favor of TA. There was no significant difference in RCC-/non-RCC-specific survival among treatment modalities.

conclusionsIt is important to make informed decisions about treating RCC in the elderly to reduce morbidity/mortality. PVD could be a determining factor favoring TA for amenable tumors.

Indexed as

Ablation TechniquesCarcinoma, Renal CellKidney NeoplasmsNephrectomyPostoperative ComplicationsAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesSurvival Rateelderlylocalized cancernephrectomyrenal cell carcinomasmall renal massthermal ablation

Identifiers

PMID39470685
PMCPMC12065447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.