ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2024
The Short- and Long-Term Perceptual Learning of Clinical Dynamic Visual Acuity Test.
Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Binocular Vision Anomalies: An Update on Prevalence, Impact, Technological and Treatment Developments and Current Challenges.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026Review
- The association between objective visual quality, retinal structure, and dynamic visual acuity.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Efficient saccade enhances performance in clinical dynamic visual acuity test.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Perceptual Learning and Video Game Training for Adults with Monocular Amblyopia.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the short- and long-term learning effect of dynamic visual acuity (DVA) tests. Methods: Participants between 18 and 30 years with corrected to normal visual acuity were enrolled in this study. Three repeated sessions were performed, with 15 minutes and 15 days' intervals between sessions. Each session included 9 DVA tests of horizontal, vertical, and diagonal motions of E optotypes at 20, 40, and 80 degrees per second (dps). The short- and long-term learning effects were analyzed from repeated DVA tests. Results: Of the 58 enrolled participants, the mean age was 23.1 ± 2.1 years. DVA significantly varied among motion types and velocities (P < 0.05, respectively). There was a significant short-term learning effect for 20 (P = 0.004), 40 (P < 0.001), and 80 (P = 0.014) dps DVA test of horizontal motion, 40 dps DVA test of vertical (P = 0.003), and diagonal motion (P = 0.036). The long-term learning effect was detected in the 40 dps diagonal motion DVA test (P = 0.015). The short- and long-term learning effects were positively associated with initial DVA in most combinations of motion type and velocity tests (P < 0.05, respectively). The short- (P = 0.031) and long-term (P = 0.024) learning effect of 80 dps horizontal motion DVA test was greater in male than female participants. Conclusions: There is a significant short-term learning effect in the DVA test of various motion types, but the long-term learning effect was rarely observed, and it is greater in participants with worse initial DVA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.