ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2024
The Increase in Corneal Stiffness After Accelerated Corneal Cross-Linking in Progressive Keratoconus Using Different Methods of Epithelial Debridement.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Regional Dependence of Corvis ST Biomechanical Parameters on Corneal Material Properties: A Finite Element Study.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Regional Biomechanical and Topographic Changes after Transepithelial vs. Epithelium-off Continuous Accelerated Corneal Cross-linking in Keratoconus: Updated Stress-Strain Index as a Superior Biomarker.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
- Efficacy and safety of progressive fluence pulsed light epithelium-on accelerated corneal cross-linking for progressive keratoconus: 18-month prospective results.International journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Evaluating corneal cross-linking using Stress-Strain Index maps: a finite element study.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate corneal stiffening after epithelium-off accelerated corneal cross-linking (CXL; 9 mW/cm²) in progressive keratoconus (KC) with different methods of epithelial debridement. Methods: This was a retrospective, interventional, and non-randomized study. In group 1, the epithelium was removed using a hockey knife (N = 45). In group 2 (N = 39) and group 3 (N = 22), the epithelial thickness was measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT) and the epithelium was ablated by excimer laser, but, in group 3, stromal ablation was performed additionally to correct high order aberrations (HOAs). Corneal biomechanics (integrated invers radius [IIR], stress-strain index [SSI]) and corneal tomography (thinnest corneal thickness [TCT]) were assessed with Corvis ST and Pentacam prior to and 1 month after CXL. Results: Corneal tomography did not differ among the groups preoperatively (P > 0.05). TCT decreased significantly in all groups after surgery (all P < 0.05). Nonetheless, corneal biomechanical stiffening was found in all three groups indicated by a decreased IIR and an increased SSI (all P < 0.05). For group 3, the HOA improved significantly (P < 0.001). Among the groups, there were no significant differences in changes of biomechanical parameters, but TCT was significantly reduced after laser ablation. Conclusions: Corneal stiffening after CXL is independent from epithelial removal. In particular, despite the removal of stromal tissue to correct HOA, a stiffening effect was achieved in keratoconic corneas, even it was less pronounced compared to mechanical epithelial removal. The reduction in HOA indicates a possible improvement in visual acuity. Translation Relevance: Cross-linking stiffens the keratoconus independent of epithelial debridement technique and may compensate minor stromal laser ablation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.