Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39470406›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2024

Welfare and performance benefits of shade provision during summer for feedlot cattle in a temperate climatic zone.

David W Miller, Anne L Barnes, Teresa Collins, Liselotte Pannier, Joshua Aleri, Shane K Maloney, Fiona Anderson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

David W MillerSchool of Agricultural Sciences, College of Environmental and Life Sciences, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4634-5819
Anne L BarnesSchool of Veterinary Medicine, College of Environmental and Life Sciences, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA, Australia.
Teresa CollinsSchool of Veterinary Medicine, College of Environmental and Life Sciences, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA, Australia.
Liselotte PannierSchool of Agricultural Sciences, College of Environmental and Life Sciences, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA, Australia.
Joshua AleriSchool of Veterinary Medicine, College of Environmental and Life Sciences, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4498-2152
Shane K MaloneySchool of Human Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia.
Fiona AndersonSchool of Agricultural Sciences, College of Environmental and Life Sciences, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2573-9077

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is increasing interest from cattle lot-feeders in the use of shade to mitigate the effects of a potential heat-stress event, though it is unclear whether the reported benefits of shade in previous studies conducted in more high-risk heat-stress zones are pertinent in cooler temperate zones. The objectives of this study were to measure the welfare and performance benefits of shade provision for lot-fed cattle at a commercial feedlot located in a mild heat-stress risk zone in Western Australia. Six blocks of black Angus (Bos taurus) steers were inducted into the feedlot over 6 time windows across a southern hemisphere summer, with 80 cattle per block housed in a partially shaded pen (providing 3.125 m2 of shade per animal) and 80 in an unshaded pen. Parameters assessed in 960 cattle over the first 70 d in the feedlot included weight gain, feed intake, and physiological and behavioral indices of overall health and welfare. Over the months of October to May in which the experiment was conducted, shaded cattle demonstrated a modest 0.13 kg overall increase in average daily gain across the 70-d feedlot period (P = 0.13). There was no difference in dry matter intake between any block or treatment. The physiological and behavioral markers of health and welfare revealed that, even during to the hottest times of the experiment, the cattle were quite able to thermoregulate, via increased panting and seeking shade (if available), to maintain physiological homeostasis. In addition, we measured the effect of heat stress and shade provision on the affective state of the cattle. Qualitative behavioral assessment was used to indicate that the cattle in the "no stress" temperature humidity index (THI) category and the shaded cattle in the "moderate stress" THI category displayed the most positive demeanor (P < 0.05), being described as more "settled and sociable", while the unshaded cattle in the "moderate stress" THI category and all cattle in the "severe stress" THI category were described as more "agitated/anxious" (P < 0.05). Overall, the findings from the present study suggest that there are definite welfare and modest performance benefits associated with providing cattle with shade in summer in a feedlot situated in a temperate climatic zone.

Indexed as

Animal HusbandryAnimal WelfareSeasonsAnimalsCattleHousing, AnimalMaleWeight GainWestern Australiacattlecommercial feedlotheat stressperformanceshadewelfare

Identifiers

PMID39470406
PMCPMC11604116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.