ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2024
IPFMC: an iterative pathway fusion approach for enhanced multi-omics clustering in cancer research.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Multi-omics data integration for enhanced cancer subtyping via interactive multi-kernel learning.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Using multi-omics data for clustering (cancer subtyping) is crucial for precision medicine research. Despite numerous methods having been proposed, current approaches either do not perform satisfactorily or lack biological interpretability, limiting the practical application of these methods. Based on the biological hypothesis that patients with the same subtype may exhibit similar dysregulated pathways, we developed an Iterative Pathway Fusion approach for enhanced Multi-omics Clustering (IPFMC), a novel multi-omics clustering method involving two data fusion stages. In the first stage, omics data are partitioned at each layer using pathway information, with crucial pathways iteratively selected to represent samples. Ultimately, the representation information from multiple pathways is integrated. In the second stage, similarity network fusion was applied to integrate the representation information from multiple omics. Comparative experiments with nine cancer datasets from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), involving systematic comparisons with 10 representative methods, reveal that IPFMC outperforms these methods. Additionally, the biological pathways and genes identified by our approach hold biological significance, affirming not only its excellent clustering performance but also its biological interpretability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.