ArticleMedical physics2025
In-line spectroscopy for iodine quantification in dynamic contrast-enhanced dedicated breast CT.
Article in Medical physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative accuracy of spectral computed tomography and conventional computed tomography in colorectal cancer staging.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- 4D Dynamic contrast-enhanced breast CT: Phantom-based reconstruction parameter optimization for iodine quantification.Medical physics · 2025Article
- In-line spectroscopy for iodine quantification in dynamic contrast-enhanced dedicated breast CT.Medical physics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn 4D dynamic contrast-enhanced dedicated breast computed tomography (4D DCE-bCT), the functional properties of the breast will be characterized by monitoring the uptake and washout of iodine-based contrast agents over time. This information could be valuable in breast cancer treatment. However, prior to clinical implementation, it is crucial to validate the quantitative estimates of iodine concentrations at each time point during acquisition. PURPOSE: To develop an in-line spectroscopy system capable of measuring iodine concentrations in a dynamic x-ray breast phantom in real-time.
methodsPotassium iodide served as the contrast agent. The system was set-up at both the entrance and exit of the phantom. It comprises a fiber-coupled green LED and collimator, which together ensure that a parallel beam passes through the sample holder. Transmitted light is captured by a collimator on the opposite side and directed through a fiber optic cable to a photodetector for intensity measurement. The relationship between 13 iodine concentrations (0-6 mg I/mL) and light transmission was tested, and the system's repeatability and accuracy were determined.
resultsThe system exhibited a strong correlation between iodine concentration and transmission values, achieving a root-mean-square error of 0.007. The repeated measurements had relative standard deviations of 0.04% and 0.1% for repeated water measurements at the phantom's entrance and exit, respectively. Furthermore, the accuracy measurements gave a mean error of fitting of 0.008 (± 0.07) mg I/mL.
conclusionThe in-line spectroscopy system can effectively monitor iodine concentrations in a dynamic breast phantom, providing a reliable method for quantitative validation of 4D DCE-bCT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.