ArticleRevista colombiana de obstetricia y ginecologia2024
[Frequency of episiotomy practice in an institution in Quito, Ecuador 2009-2022].
Article in Revista colombiana de obstetricia y ginecologia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06758622 (Multicenter Analysis of Morbidity, Mortality and Medical Care in Neonates at the Isidro Ayora Gynecological-Obstetric Hospital, the Calderón General Teaching Hospital and the Nueva Aurora Luz Elena Arismendi Pediatric Gynecological-Obstetric Hospital, January 2008-June 2024), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Multicenter Analysis of Morbidity, Mortality and Medical Care in Neonates at the Isidro Ayora Gynecological-Obstetric Hospital, the Calderón General Teaching Hospital and the Nueva Aurora Luz Elena Arismendi Pediatric Gynecological-Obstetric Hospital, January 2008-June 2024
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To determine the prevalence of episiotomy over a 14-year period and to explore its association with maternal, delivery, and neonatal variables using administrative data. Material and methods: This is a cross-sectional study. Women who had a vaginal delivery with a live newborn at a referral hospital for obstetric care in Ecuador were included. Consecutive sampling was employed. ICD-10 records and the perinatal information system (PIS) were utilized. Sociodemographic, gestational, delivery, and neonatal variables were assessed. Descriptive analysis was performed. The overall and yearly prevalence was determined. Exploratory bivariate and multivariate analyses were conducted. The study was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of the Universidad Central del Ecuador. Results: A total of 11,862 records were analyzed. The overall prevalence of episiotomy was 36.69 %, with a maximum of 42 % and a minimum of 28 %. There is an implied trend towards a reduction in frequency from 2019 to 2022. A positive association was found between episiotomy and maternal age under 20 years, previous cesarean section, absence of a companion during delivery, term newborns, and large for gestational age newborns. A negative association was found with previous vaginal deliveries. Conclusions: The prevalence of episiotomy exceeds the recommendation of the World Health Organization (WHO). Clinical practice guidelines should consider potentially modifiable maternal and neonatal factors in their recommendations. Prospective studies should be conducted to evaluate the safety of the procedure, confirm these observations, and use robust methodologies to assess if there is a real decrease in its practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.