Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39469781›Full record

ArticlePublic health nutrition2024

Comparing Canada's 2018 proposed and 2022 final front-of-pack labelling regulations using generic food composition data and a nationally representative dietary intake survey.

Jennifer J Lee, Christine Mulligan, Mavra Ahmed, Mary R L'Abbé

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Public health nutrition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jennifer J LeeDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5S 1A8, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9381-2280
Christine MulliganDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5S 1A8, Canada.
Mavra AhmedDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5S 1A8, Canada.
Mary R L'AbbéDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5S 1A8, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objective of the study was to compare the potential dietary impact of proposed and final front-of-pack labelling (FOPL) regulations (published in

designFoods in a generic food composition database (

settingCanada.

participantsCanadian adults (≥ 19 years;

resultsCompared with

conclusionsChanges to FOPL regulations may have blunted their potential to limit intakes of nutrients-of-concern; however, they likely averted potential unintended consequences on intakes of nutrients-to-encourage for Canadians (e.g. calcium and vitamin D). To ensure policy objectives are met, FOPL regulations must be monitored regularly and evaluated over time.

Indexed as

Food LabelingNutritive ValueAdultAgedCanadaDietDiet SurveysEnergy IntakeFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNutrition PolicyYoung AdultFood labellingFood policyFront-of-pack labellingNutrient intakesNutrition labelling

Identifiers

PMID39469781
PMCPMC11604314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.