SynthesisFrontiers in immunology2024
Biologics for generalized pustular psoriasis: a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Monotherapy with Biologics for Generalized Pustular Psoriasis: A Systematic Review of Comparative Interventional Studies with an Exploratory Network Meta-Analysis.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Pooled it
- Effects of virtual reality exercise on social skills and emotional recognition among children with autism spectrum disorder: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.BMC psychology · 2026Pooled it
- The efficacy and safety of spesolimab in patients with generalized pustular psoriasis flares: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Clinical Practice Recommendations for Non-Dermatologists on the Diagnostic Suspicion of GPP.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- IL-36-Driven Inflammation in Generalized Pustular Psoriasis: Immunological Insights from Plaque Psoriasis and Implications for Targeted Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Vunakizumab and Acitretin for Elderly Refractory Generalized Pustular Psoriasis: A Case Report and Comprehensive Literature Review.Biologics : targets & therapy · 2026Article
- Case Report: Successful treatment of refractory generalized pustular psoriasis with xeligekimab: a report of two cases.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- SAPHO syndrome and pustular skin diseases: shared inflammatory circuits, divergent tissue outcomes, and the limits of a spectrum model.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Long-term comorbidities and mortality associations with treatment in generalized pustular psoriasis: a multi-institutional cohort study.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Amelioration of psoriasis-like skin lesions by human amniotic mesenchymal stem cells: insights from multiomics profiling in mice.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Targeting the US21 viroporin of human cytomegalovirus by calcium channel blockers as a new antiviral strategy.Current research in microbial sciences · 2026Article
- Case Report: Local injection of an IL-17 inhibitor successfully treats Acrodermatitis continua of Hallopeau and avoids immune shift.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Considerations for Treating Generalized Pustular Psoriasis (GPP): A Narrative Review.Dermatology and therapy · 2025Review
- Enhanced Innate Immunity Mediated by IL-36α in Atopic Dermatitis and Differences in Cytokine Profiles of Lymphocytes in the Skin and Draining Lymph Nodes.Biomolecules · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) is a rare and potentially life-threatening auto-inflammatory disease. Currently, there are no consensus-based guidelines or universally accepted treatments. Biologics represent a potential therapeutic option. This study systematically assessed the efficacy and safety of biologics in GPP. Methods: Relevant studies from three databases were systematically searched until June 28, 2024. Statistical information, including the single-arm proportion rate of the outcomes and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), was analyzed to determine treatment effects. Heterogeneity was assessed using I² values, and subgroup analyses were performed based on drug targets and treatment durations. Data were quantitatively synthesized using a random-effects meta-analysis. Analyses were performed using R statistical software version 4.4.0. Results: A total of 329 patients from 16 studies were included. The proportion of responders treated with IL-36 inhibitors and IL-17 inhibitors is higher than those treated with TNF-α inhibitors and IL-23 inhibitors. IL-36 inhibitors appear to achieve the highest response rates between 4 and 8 weeks, while IL-17 inhibitors, TNF-alpha inhibitors, and IL-23 inhibitors show a gradual increase in response rates up to 12 weeks. IL-36 inhibitors achieve a 40% (95% CI: 27%-54%) GPPASI75 response rate and a 55% (95% CI: 41%-68%) GPPGA (0,1) response rate within 2 weeks, significantly outperforming other biologics. The recurrence rates of GPP within 52 weeks, ranked from highest to lowest, are: IL-36 inhibitors (21% [95% CI: 9%-28%]), TNF-alpha inhibitors (20% [95% CI: 2%-46%]), IL-17 inhibitors (15% [95% CI: 1%-37%]), and IL-23 inhibitors (5% [95% CI: 0%-29%]). Additionally, 6% (95% CI: 1%-11%) of patients experienced severe adverse events. Discussion: This meta-analysis highlights the efficacy and safety of biologics in patients with GPP, offering valuable evidence to guide future clinical practice. IL-36 inhibitors show a faster and more substantial clinical response in GPP compared to other biologics. Further research is necessary to assess their role in specific subpopulations and to evaluate their potential long-term effects on flare prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.