Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39469702›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

A threat modeling framework for IoT-Based botnet attacks.

Hojun Jin, GyuHyun Jeon, Hee Won Aneka Choi, Seungho Jeon, Jung Taek Seo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hojun JinDepartment of Information Security, Gachon University, South Korea.
GyuHyun JeonDepartment of Information Security, Gachon University, South Korea.
Hee Won Aneka ChoiDepartment of Information Security, Gachon University, South Korea.
Seungho JeonDepartment of Computer Engineering, Gachon University, South Korea.
Jung Taek SeoDepartment of Computer Engineering, Gachon University, South Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Internet of Things (IoT) devices are much closer to users than personal computers used in traditional computing environments. Due to prevalence of IoT devices, even if they are compromised and used in attacks, it is difficult to detect and respond to them. Currently, there has been extensive research on threat modeling for cyberattacks. However, there remains a significant gap in research concerning threat modeling for attacks specially targeting IoT devices within the fifth-generation communication environment. In this paper, we present IoT Targeting-Threat Modeling(I3TM) framework established by analyzing botnets that are appeared before 2021 such as Mirai, Pink etc. Through this framework, we identify tactics and techniques to respond to the attacks. Using the identified tactics and techniques from our proposed framework, we can promptly respond to the newly detected attacks. We constructed a Threat Modeling Framework Keyword-Based Metrics to show extracted keywords from reports, academic papers, and white paper that identifies the features of botnet. We also provide an objective way to apply those keywords to the framework. Our framework is organized to analyze the attack process of botnets that may occur against IoT. The framework derives execution for each tactic for objective analysis based on keywords. In the validation for the framework, I3TM identified eight Tactics from Medusa botnet. If the application of the I3TM framework is continuously accumulated, a baseline of similar attack methods and data will be formed. In future research, we are planning to append mitigations for the attacks targeting IoT to the I3TM framework.

Indexed as

BotnetI3TMIoTThreat modeling framework

Identifiers

PMID39469702
PMCPMC11513456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.