ArticleHeliyon2024
Experimental validation of a novel hybrid Equilibrium Slime Mould Optimization for solar photovoltaic system.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Maximizing Power Point Tracking (MPPT) is an essential technique in photovoltaic (PV) systems that guarantees the highest potential conversion of sunlight energy under any irradiance changes. Efficient and reliable MPPT technique is a challenge faced by researchers due to factors such as fluctuations in irradiance and the presence of partial shading. This paper introduced a novel hybrid Equilibrium Slime Mould Optimization (ESMO) MPPT-based algorithm combining the advantages of two recent algorithms, Slime Mould Optimization (SMO) and Equilibrium Optimizer (EO). The ESMO algorithm is compared with highly efficient MPPT-based techniques such as SMO, EO, Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), Grey Wolf Optimization (GWO), and Whale Optimization Algorithm (WOA), both under a Simulink environment and a real-time experimental laboratory setup using a Dspace1104 controller and PV emulator. The comparison focuses on performance under several irradiance cases, including instant irradiance change, partial shading, complex partial shading, and dynamic partial shading. The key advantage of ESMO is the fact that it has a single tunable parameter, which makes implementation much easier and, at the same time, reduces the computational resources that are required by the control system. Extensive testing proves the superiority of ESMO over all other techniques, the average efficiency of which is 99.98% under all conditions. Additionally, ESMO provides fast average tracking times of 244 ms under simulation experiments and 200 ms for real-time experiments. These results show that ESMO can be very important for future implementation in large-scale solar PV systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.