Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39469641›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024

Triple combination of vemurafenib, cobimetinib, and atezolizumab in real clinical practice in the Russian Federation: results of the A1 cohort of the ISABELLA study.

Igor V Samoylenko, Yulia M Kolontareva, Ekaterina V Kogay, Natalia V Zhukova, Igor A Utyashev, Mikhail E Ivannikov, Konstantin V Menshikov, Maxim V Zinkevich, Kristina V Orlova, Yulia V Vakhabova and 14 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05402059 (prospectIve Non-interventional Study of Clinical Outcomes And Biomarkers in Patients With Stage 0-IV mElanoma in reaL clinicaL prActice), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05402059 unknown statusnot on this map

prospectIve Non-interventional Study of Clinical Outcomes And Biomarkers in Patients With Stage 0-IV mElanoma in reaL clinicaL prActice

TypeobservationalSponsorMelanomaPRO, RussiaRan2022 to 2025Enrolled1,570ConditionsMelanoma, Melanoma (Skin), Melanoma, Uveal, Melanoma Stage IVArmssurgery (any volume) and / or pharmaceuticals treatment initiated or planned or only dynamic observation, in accordance with current clinical guidelines
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Igor V SamoylenkoSkin tumors department, NN Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Moscow, Russia.
Yulia M KolontarevaHoffman-La Roche, Scientific Health Chapter, Moscow, Russia.
Ekaterina V KogaySkin tumors department, NN Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Moscow, Russia.
Natalia V ZhukovaSt. Petersburg City Clinical Oncology Dispensary, St. Petersburg, Russia.
Igor A UtyashevHadassah Clinic, Moscow, Russia.
Mikhail E IvannikovMoscow Regional Clinical Oncological Dispensary, Balashikha, Russia.
Konstantin V MenshikovUfa Republican Clinical Oncological Dispensary of the Ministry of Health Republic of Bashkortostan, Ufa, Russia.
Maxim V ZinkevichLeningrad Regional Clinical Oncological Dispensary, St. Petersburg, Russia.
Kristina V OrlovaSkin tumors department, NN Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Moscow, Russia.
Yulia V VakhabovaEuropean Medical Center, Moscow, Russia.
Mikhail V VolkonskyMoscow City Oncological Hospital No.62, Moscow, Russia.
Natalia A BeliaevaOrenburg Regional Clinical Oncological Dispensary, Orenburg, Russia.
Ivan I ButkovMedical Center Medical City, Tyumen, Russia.
Elena V KarabinaTula Regional Clinical Oncological Dispensary, Tula, Russia.
Tatyana L MoskovkinaKurgan Regional Oncological Dispensary, Kurgan, Russia.
Kseniya A MoshkovaNizhny Novgorod Regional Clinical Oncological Dispensary, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia.
Olga V PlishkinaKirov Center of Oncology and Medical Radiology, Kirov, Russia.
Vitaliy D SychevTambov Regional Clinical Oncological Dispensary, Tambov, Russia.
Oxana S CheplukhovaMurmansk Oncological Dispensary, Murmansk, Russia.
Vera V ChernovaRyazan Clinical Oncological Dispensary, Ryazan, Russia.
Alexandr N YurchenkovMoscow City Oncological Hospital No.62, Moscow, Russia.
Ksenia G BabinaVolgograd Regional Clinical Oncological Dispensary, Volgograd, Russia.
Nikita A SavelovMoscow City Oncological Hospital No.62, Moscow, Russia.
Lev V DemidovSkin tumors department, NN Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Moscow, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Among several treatment options for BRAF-mutant metastatic melanoma, a combination of BRAF inhibitor, MEK inhibitor, and anti-PDL1 antibody seems to be a new emergent approach recently registered in the Russian Federation. It is still not clear which patient population benefits more from this simultaneous use of three drugs instead of its sequencing. Aim: This study aimed to evaluate patients' characteristics treated in real practice in 14 Russian regions by triple combination and to analyze their outcomes depending on biomarkers (PD-L1 expression). Methods: This was a part (cohort A1) of a prospective non-interventional study of clinical outcomes and biomarkers in patients with skin melanoma. Patients were included in cohort A1 if combination treatment with vemurafenib (vem) + cobimetinib (cobi) + atezolizumab (atezo) was initiated no earlier than 12 weeks (84 days) prior to written informed consent to participate in this study. The index event was the initiation of therapy with all three drugs vem + cobi + atezo (i.e., triple combination). The primary efficacy endpoint of the study was the 24-month overall survival (OS), defined as the time from the index date to the date of death from any cause. If the patient did not experience an event, the OS will be censored at the date of the last contact. Objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DoR), and progression-free survival (PFS) in the Intention to treat (ITT) population, in biomarker positive population, and in population with brain metastases were also evaluated. Quality of life questionnaires were pre-planned by protocol if it was a part of routine practice. Adverse events were also collected. Results: Between March 2021 and May 2023, 59 patients were enrolled in 19 centers from 14 regions of Russia. Thirty-one of 59 (52.4%) patients had central nervous system metastases, and 18 of 31 (58.4%) were symptomatic. Forty of 59 patients (68%) received the triple combination as the first-line treatment. The median follow-up period was 16.83 [95% confidence interval (CI) 13.8-19.8] months. The mean duration of therapy with this regimen was 9.95 months (95% CI 7.48-13.8). ORR was 55.1%; progression as the best outcome was seen in 16.3%. The median DoR was 12.95 months (95% CI 11.0-14.8 months), with a median of 20.3 months (95% CI 9.1-31.5 months) when triple therapy was administered in the first-line treatment. In patients with brain metastases ( Conclusion: Triple combination of atezolizumab, vemurafenib, and cobimetinib had proven its efficacy and tolerability in real settings. No impact of potential predictive biomarkers was seen (NCT05402059).

Indexed as

atezolizumabBRAF-mutantbrain metastasescobimetinibmetastatic melanomatriple combinationvemurafenib

Identifiers

PMID39469641
PMCPMC11514068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.