Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39469540›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in surgery2024

Microbiology of periprosthetic infections following implant-based breast reconstruction surgery: a multicentric retrospective study.

Andrea Vittorio Emanuele Lisa, Flavia Zeneli, Martina Mazzucco, Benedetta Barbieri, Mario Rietjens, Germana Lissidini, Valeriano Vinci, Michele Bartoletti, Alessandra Belati, Davide Bavaro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Frontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Andrea Vittorio Emanuele LisaDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy.
Flavia ZeneliDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy.
Martina MazzuccoDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Benedetta BarbieriDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy.
Mario RietjensDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy.
Germana LissidiniDivision of Breast Surgery, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), Milan, Italy.
Valeriano VinciDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy.
Michele BartolettiDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy.
Alessandra BelatiDivision of Infectious Diseases, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Davide BavaroDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Implant-based breast reconstruction (IBR) is the predominant breast reconstruction technique post-mastectomy, with bacterial infections being a significant complication affecting patient recovery and quality of life. The following study aimed to determine the microbiological features of the causative agents responsible for breast implant infections, with more attention paid to the comparative analysis of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria and their presentation. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 214 patients who presented with periprosthetic infection and underwent implant removal following implant-based breast reconstruction at Humanitas Research Hospital and Istituto Europeo di Oncologia between January 2018 and March 2024. Results: The study revealed that Gram-positive bacteria were more prevalent, with Conclusions: Gram-positive bacteria, especially

Indexed as

breast implant infectionbreast reconstructioncomplicationsgram positive bacteriamultiresistant bacteria

Identifiers

PMID39469540
PMCPMC11513354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.