Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39469515›Full record

ArticleIranian endodontic journal2024

Cleaning Ability of Gentlefile Rotary System Compared with Three Alternative Brands.

Amir Ardalan Abdollahi, Farough Ghotbi Rad, Roya Amani, Mohammad Saadat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Iranian endodontic journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Amir Ardalan AbdollahiDepartment of Endodontic, School of Dentistry, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran.
Farough Ghotbi RadDepartment of Endodontic, School of Dentistry, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran.
Roya AmaniPrivate Practice, Urmia, Iran.
Mohammad SaadatPrivate Practice, Tabriz, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: In this study, the cleaning ability of a stainless-steel rotary instrument called Gentlefile, was compared with three nickel-titanium rotary instruments. Materials and Methods: In this Results: The Gentlefile demonstrated a promising outcome in smear layer clearance and debris removal compared with the other three rotary systems ( Conclusion: The Gentlefile rotary system can be capable of cleaning the apical third of root canals more than the other three groups including Protaper Universal, RaCe, and XP-Endo Finisher.

Indexed as

CleanlinessInstrumentationRoot Canal PreparationSmear Layer

Identifiers

PMID39469515
PMCPMC11512708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.