Management Strategies for Immature Teeth with Pulp Necrosis: An Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews.

Introduction: This review evaluates the effectiveness of treatment modalities for immature teeth with pulp necrosis, focusing on calcium hydroxide (CH) and mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) apexification, as well as regenerative endodontic treatments (RETs). Recent advancements and clinical outcomes are highlighted. Materials and Methods: A comprehensive search of MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and grey literature was conducted from inception to July 2024. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses (SR/MAs) assessing apexification and RET outcomes in immature teeth with pulp necrosis were included. Studies were selected based on predefined criteria, and data on study design, interventions, and outcomes were extracted. Methodological quality was evaluated using the AMSTAR-2 tool. Results: 31 SR/MAs were included. The quality ranged from critically low to low, except one rated as high. MTA apexification was more effective than CH for faster apical barrier formation, though overall success rates were similar. MTA is preferred for its efficiency, but standardized protocols are needed, and tooth discoloration was noted as a potential complication. RET generally outperforms apexification in root maturation, with platelet concentrates like platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) showing promising results; PRP was associated with greater root length, while PRF showed superior apical healing. Variability in RET outcomes was noted due to the lack of standardized protocols. Comparative studies of RET versus apexification showed no significant differences in survival or overall success rates. RET often provides better apical closure and root development, though results vary. Both approaches are viable, but more research with standardized protocols and larger samples is needed to establish definitive clinical advantages. Conclusions: MTA apexification and RET are viable alternatives to CH apexification, with RET showing greater potential for root development and apical healing. Future research should focus on developing standardized protocols and uniform RET guidelines, and evaluating long-term outcomes to establish efficacy and safety.