ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2024
Effect of touch on proprioception: non-invasive trigeminal nerve stimulation suggests general arousal rather than tactile-proprioceptive integration.
Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Proprioceptive error of estimated fingertip position in two-dimensional space is reduced with the addition of tactile stimulation applied at the fingertip. Tactile input does not disrupt the participants' estimation strategy, as the individual error vector maps maintain their overall structure. This relationship suggests integration of proprioception and tactile information improves proprioceptive estimation, which can also be improved with trained mental focus and attention. Task attention and arousal are physiologically regulated by the reticular activating system (RAS), a brainstem circuit including the locus coeruleus (LC). There is direct and indirect evidence that these structures can be modulated by non-invasive trigeminal nerve stimulation (nTNS), providing an opportunity to examine nTNS effect on the integrative relationship of proprioceptive and tactile information. Methods: Fifteen right-handed participants performed a simple right-handed proprioceptive estimation task with tactile feedback (touch) and no tactile (hover) feedback. Participants repeated the task after nTNS administration. Stimulation was delivered for 10 min, and stimulation parameters were 3,000 Hz, 50 μs pulse width, with a mean of 7 mA. Error maps across the workspace are generated using polynomial models of the participants' target responses. Results: Error maps did not demonstrate significant vector direction changes between conditions for any participant, indicating that nTNS does not disrupt spatial proprioception estimation strategies. A linear mixed model regression with nTNS epoch, tactile condition, and the interaction as factors demonstrated that nTNS reduced proprioceptive error under the hover condition only. Discussion: We argue that nTNS does not disrupt spatial proprioceptive error maps but can improve proprioceptive estimation in the absence of tactile feedback. However, we observe no evidence that nTNS enhances tactile-proprioceptive integration as the touch condition does not exhibit significantly reduced error after nTNS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.