ReviewMedical devices (Auckland, N.Z.)2024
Problems Related to Endotracheal Intubation as an Input for the Design of a New Endotracheal Tube.
Review in Medical devices (Auckland, N.Z.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of silicone and PVC tube intubation on postoperative sore throat after thyroid surgery: a randomized controlled trial.BMC anesthesiology · 2025Trial
- Comparative Effectiveness of Oral Endotracheal Tube Securement Methods in Adults: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2026Review
- Article
- Outcomes and mortality predictors after tracheostomy in intensive care unit patients with infectious diseases: A 5-year retrospective cohort study from Brazil.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Bronchoscopic closure of intubation-related bronchopleural fistulas using combined argon plasma coagulation and fibrin glue: a case series.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2026Article
- High-flow nasal cannula use for respiratory support in children for indications other than acute bronchiolitis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2026Article
- Factors associated with postoperative dysphagia in older adults with hip fracture: a scoping review.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Review
- Effectiveness and Safety of Nasal Herbal Steam Therapy for Post-Extubation Respiratory Symptoms: A Methodology of Pragmatic Randomized Controlled, Parallel Grouped Study.Integrative cancer therapiesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of the current review is to identify the main problems of endotracheal intubation, which will serve as a basis for the design requirements for a novel endotracheal tube. Methodology: A PICO systematic search was conducted in PubMed up to December 2021 to identify issues related both to the endotracheal intubation procedure and device-specific factors. Results: Two primary categories of problems were identified during endotracheal intubation: a) Issues related to laryngotracheal symptoms such as cough, hoarseness, aphonia, dysphonia, dysphagia, swallowing difficulties and the risk of stenosis with long-term intubation. The underlying pressure, abrasion and/or decubitus phenomena should be considered in a new design approach. b) Issues related to the cuff sealing and microaspirations, where the risk of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) highlights the need to improve the design. Discussion & Conclusion: This review has yielded valuable input for rethinking the design of endotracheal tubes to ensure an efficient and safe airway. This new design should focus on the protection of anatomical structures, avoid or reduce the phenomena of laryngotracheal symptoms, and even reduce the risk of ventilator-associated-pneumonia (VAP) and/or prevent the need for certain tracheostomies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.