ReviewCureus2024
Surgical Variations of the Modified Latarjet Procedure: A Literature Review and Video-Illustrated Surgical Technique.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The modified Latarjet procedure, otherwise known as the Walch-Boileau procedure, is a very successful management procedure for recurrent shoulder dislocation especially in patients with glenoid bone loss of less than 30 percent. Multiple variations of the surgical technique have been proposed over the years, some of which are still controversial. These variations include arthroscopic vs open technique, traditional versus congruent arc Latarjet procedure, subscapularis split versus L-shaped tenotomy, intra-articular versus extra-articular coracoid placement, capsular repair versus no repair, and the various modalities of coracoid fixation. The current evidence is based on a group of low-evidence heterogenous studies since some of these variations lack strong clinical comparative studies that control other variables. In this literature review, we present the evidence available for each of the above major variations. Furthermore, we present a video illustration of the surgical procedure done in our tertiary care center.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.