ArticleCureus2024
Does Preoperative Virtual Reality Experience Enhance Implant Positioning Accuracy in Total Hip Arthroplasty?
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prophylactic fixation in elderly fractures: Preventive breakthrough or unnecessary intervention?World journal of orthopedics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose Total hip arthroplasty (THA) requires precise implant positioning to ensure long-term success. Herein, we evaluated the effect of virtual reality (VR) on the surgical precision of THA, particularly when used by experienced surgeons. Methods In this single-center, prospective, case-control study, 34 patients who underwent primary THA performed by a single experienced surgeon were divided into the control (without VR simulation) and VR (with VR simulation) groups. Preoperative planning involved the creation of three-dimensional models from computed tomography scans using ZedHip® software (Lexi, Tokyo, Japan). The primary outcomes assessed included the accuracy of implant placement, operative time, and intraoperative blood loss. The secondary outcomes included postoperative hospital stay and in-hospital complications. Results A significant improvement in radiographic inclination (RI) was observed in the VR group as compared to controls. Other surgical parameters, such as radiographic anteversion, operation time, blood loss, and postoperative hospital stay, showed no significant differences between the groups. Discrepancies in planned versus actual implant sizes were noted but were not significantly different between groups. Conclusion VR application in preoperative planning improved the RI accuracy in acetabular cup placement for THA, demonstrating its potential to enhance surgical precision for experienced surgeons. This study highlights the evolving role of VR, from a training tool to an integral part of advanced surgical planning in orthopedics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.