ReviewCureus2024
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Young Athletes: A Comprehensive Review of Lateral Extra-Articular Tenodesis and Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction Techniques.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are prevalent among young athletes and pose significant challenges due to their impact on immediate and long-term knee function. Traditional ACL reconstruction techniques, while effective, may not always meet the unique needs of this population, particularly given their high physical demands and the risk of future complications. This review evaluates two advanced surgical techniques - lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LEAT) and anterolateral ligament (ALL) reconstruction - as potential enhancements to conventional ACL reconstruction. LEAT involves augmenting knee stability by addressing lateral compartment issues, while ALL reconstruction focuses on reconstructing the ALL to improve overall knee function. The review compares these techniques regarding surgical procedures, clinical outcomes, biomechanical effectiveness, and complications. LEAT and ALL reconstruction are examined for their impact on recovery, return-to-sport rates, and long-term knee health, highlighting their advantages and limitations. Findings suggest that both techniques offer promising benefits, with the potential for improved outcomes compared to traditional methods. However, the effectiveness of each technique can vary based on individual factors and the specific demands of different sports. Further research is needed to fully understand the long-term implications and refine these approaches. This review aims to guide clinical decision-making and optimize treatment strategies for young athletes with ACL injuries, enhancing their prospects for a successful return to athletic activity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.