ArticleCureus2024
The Effect of Anesthesia Method on Melatonin Level and Its Relationship With Postpartum Depression ın Cesarean Section Patients.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective Our study aimed to establish the effects of anesthetic agents used in cesarean sections on melatonin levels and to evaluate the possible association between melatonin levels and postpartum depression. Materials and methods Our study was approved by the Erzincan Binali Yıldırım University Ethics Committee (approval number: 25.07.2017 11/11). We included 231 pregnant women between the ages of 18 and 45 who were admitted for a cesarean section to Erzincan Mengücek Gazi Training and Research Hospital Anesthesiology and Reanimation Clinic. The pregnant women were divided into three groups that underwent general, spinal, and combined spinal-epidural anesthesia, respectively. These approaches were determined by the preference of the attending anesthesiologist. On the postoperative first day at 5:00 am, peripheral venous blood samples were obtained from the subjects for melatonin level measurement. Samples were centrifuged and kept in -80 °C until the testing for melatonin with the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) method. In order to determine the depression status, the subjects were evaluated with the Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale. Results Of all the anesthesia types given to the subjects, 16% was combined spinal-epidural anesthesia, 18.2% was general anesthesia, and 65.8% was spinal anesthesia. According to the scale, 68% of the subjects had no depression and 32% had depression. The depression rate in subjects who underwent general anesthesia was significantly higher than in other groups (p<0.001). The association between the anesthesia method and melatonin levels had no statistically significant difference (p=0.53). The association between depression status and melatonin levels had no statistically significant difference among the two groups (p=0.097). Conclusion We aimed to evaluate the effect of the chosen anesthesia method on postoperative melatonin levels and postpartum depression and found that the chosen method of anesthesia does not affect postoperative melatonin levels significantly but the usage of general anesthesia significantly raises the postpartum depression rate among subjects. We also did not find any correlation between postoperative melatonin levels and postpartum depression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.