Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39469354›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Perceptions Regarding the Use of E-cigarettes Among Smokers in Saudi Arabia.

Hani S Almugti, Noha A Alzahrani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hani S AlmugtiPrimary Health Care, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, King Saud bin Abdul-Aziz University for Health Sciences, Ministry of National Guard - Health Affairs, Jeddah, SAU.
Noha A AlzahraniSaudi Board of Preventive Medicine: Preventive Medicine, Ministry of National Guard - Health Affairs, Jeddah, SAU.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Adults and young people select electronic cigarettes (ECs) due to their perceived lower risk compared to traditional combustible cigarettes. Objective This study aimed to measure the perceptions of the use of electronic cigarettes as a smoking cessation tool among the population of Saudi Arabia. Methods Between October 2023 and November 2023, we conducted a cross-sectional study of Saudi Arabia's general population over prominent social media platforms. We strictly adhered to the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines to report our results. Results Of the 376 total participants, the majority (89.6%) were male, with a median age of 35 years, and 96.3% were of Saudi nationality. Nearly half (47.3%) held Bachelor's degrees. Approximately 55.6% reported having previously attempted to quit smoking on multiple occasions. The predominant method for quitting was the use of ECs, which was reported by 88.7% of the participants. Nearly two-thirds (70%) perceived ECs as an effective cessation tool. Among those who had used EC to quit smoking, 62.5% had succeeded, while one-third (37.5%) were unsuccessful. The most frequently reported side effects were sore throat, changes in appetite, and headache, each of which affected ~50% of the participants. Conclusion This study highlights the complex relationship between EC use and smoking cessation among Saudi Arabian smokers. Although many users perceive ECs as effective cessation tools, their actual success rates in terms of long-term abstinence from smoking are questionable.

Indexed as

e-cigarettessaudi arabiasmokersmoking cessationvaping

Identifiers

PMID39469354
PMCPMC11516214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.