ArticleCureus2024
Incidence of Posterior Capsule Rupture During Phacoemulsification Cataract Surgery Among Patients Treated With Intravitreal Bevacizumab Injections.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo assess whether intravitreal bevacizumab injections increase the risk of posterior capsular rupture during phacoemulsification cataract surgery in diabetic patients.
methodsA retrospective study that included diabetic patients who underwent phacoemulsification cataract surgery at King Hussein Medical Center of the Jordanian Royal Medical Services during a one-year period from January 2023 until January 2024. Patients were categorized into four groups. The first group did not receive an intravitreal bevacizumab injection; the second group received only one injection; the third group received two injections; and the fourth group received three or more injections. Results from the four groups were compared with a control group for patients who underwent phacoemulsification surgery and were not known to have diabetes mellitus and did not receive previous intravitreal injections. All injections were received within a period of one year before the time of phacoemulsification surgery. Inclusion criteria for the study groups included diabetic patients with a history of diabetes of more than 10 years with the presence of diabetic retinopathy. Exclusion criteria included patients who received intravitreal injections other than bevacizumab, previous intraocular surgery or trauma, and the presence of ocular pathology that led to an increased risk of posterior capsular rupture. The incidence of posterior capsular rupture was compared among these groups. A p-value was used to assess statistical significance and was considered to be statistically significant if ≤0.05.
resultsThe number of patients in the control group (group 0) was 1440 patients with a mean age of 64.9, and in the study groups were 1306 patients. Group 1 included 244 patients (18.7%) with a mean age of 62.4 years, compared to 306 patients (23.4%) in group 2 with a mean age of 66.1 years, 352 patients (27%) in group 3 with a mean age of 64.2 years, and 404 patients (30.9%) in group 4 with a mean age of 63.1 years. Posterior capsular rupture occurred more significantly in patients with group 4. It occurred in 21 patients, representing 5.2% of them, compared to four patients (1.6%) of group 1, six patients (2%) of group 2, and eight patients (2.3%) of group 3, while in the control group, the number of patients with posterior capsular rupture was 20 (1.4%).
conclusionIntravitreal bevacizumab in diabetic patients is considered a risk factor for posterior capsular rupture in phacoemulsification cataract surgery in patients receiving more than three injections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.