Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39469327›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2024

Associations of sarcopenia, obesity, and metabolic health with the risk of urinary incontinence in U.S. adult women: a population-based cross-sectional study.

Fei-Xue Shao, Wei-Jia Luo, Li-Qun Lou, Sheng Wan, Shi-Feng Zhao, Tian-Fan Zhou, Chen-Chen Zhou, Ying-Ying Yang, Gui-Zhu Wu, Xiao-Lin Hua

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Fei-Xue Shao *Shanghai Key Laboratory of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Shanghai Institute of Maternal-Fetal Medicine and Gynecologic Oncology, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Wei-Jia Luo *Shanghai Key Laboratory of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Shanghai Institute of Maternal-Fetal Medicine and Gynecologic Oncology, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Li-Qun Lou *Shanghai Key Laboratory of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Shanghai Institute of Maternal-Fetal Medicine and Gynecologic Oncology, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Sheng WanDepartment of Obstetrics, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Shi-Feng ZhaoShanghai Key Laboratory of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Shanghai Institute of Maternal-Fetal Medicine and Gynecologic Oncology, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Tian-Fan ZhouShanghai Key Laboratory of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Shanghai Institute of Maternal-Fetal Medicine and Gynecologic Oncology, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Chen-Chen ZhouDepartment of Obstetrics, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Ying-Ying YangClinical Research Unit, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Gui-Zhu WuShanghai Key Laboratory of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Shanghai Institute of Maternal-Fetal Medicine and Gynecologic Oncology, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Xiao-Lin HuaShanghai Key Laboratory of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Shanghai Institute of Maternal-Fetal Medicine and Gynecologic Oncology, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Urinary incontinence (UI) significantly impairs women's quality of life. Identifying its risk factors is essential for developing effective interventions. Sarcopenia, characterized by the accelerated loss of muscle mass and function, is an emerging concern often linked to obesity and abnormal metabolic status, exacerbating various adverse health outcomes. This population-based study aimed to explore the independent and joint associations of sarcopenia, obesity, and metabolic health with UI risk, as well as to evaluate the mediating role of metabolic indicators in these associations. Methods: A total of 3,557 women aged ≥20 years from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey were included. Sarcopenia was assessed using the appendicular lean mass index (ALMI), and obesity was defined by body mass index and waist circumference. Metabolic health was evaluated using revised criteria from the National Cholesterol Education Program-Adult Treatment Panel III. UI was identified through responses to the "Kidney Conditions-Urology" questionnaire and classified into stress UI (SUI), urgency UI (UUI), and mixed UI (MUI). Multivariable logistic regression and restricted cubic spline models were used to evaluate the associations and visualize the relationship between ALMI and UI. Mediation models were constructed to assess the mediating role of metabolic indicators. Results: We found that sarcopenia was significantly associated with an increased risk of MUI in the general population. Age-specific analysis revealed that sarcopenia is an independent risk factor for SUI in women aged ≥60, and for MUI in women aged 40-59 years. Sarcopenic obesity, particularly under central obesity criteria, further elevated the risk of UI. Notably, women with the metabolically unhealthy obese phenotype with sarcopenia were at the highest risk for both SUI and MUI. Metabolically unhealthy status, glycohemoglobin, vitamin D, and serum albumin levels were partial mediators of these associations. Conclusion: Our findings elucidated the complex interactions between sarcopenia, obesity, and metabolic health, underscoring the critical need for integrated therapeutic strategies that address both metabolic health and targeted nutritional interventions, aiming to enhance muscular health and effectively manage and prevent UI.

Indexed as

DXAmetabolic healthNHANESobesitysarcopeniaurinary incontinence

Identifiers

PMID39469327
PMCPMC11513287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.