Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39469316›Full record

ArticleThe Canadian journal of statistics = Revue canadienne de statistique2024

Smoothed model-assisted small area estimation of proportions.

Peter A Gao, Jon Wakefield

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Canadian journal of statistics = Revue canadienne de statistique, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A Spatial Variance-Smoothing Area Level Model for Small Area Estimation of Demographic Rates.International statistical review = Revue internationale de statistique · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Peter A GaoDepartment of Statistics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, U.S.A.ORCID 0000-0002-2856-6343
Jon WakefieldDepartment of Statistics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, U.S.A.

Funding

STATISTICAL ISSUES IN AIDS RESEARCHR37AI029168 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI JAMES P HUGHES · 1999 to 2026
$9.8M
Scientific/Technical CoreP2CHD042828 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI SARA R. CURRAN · 2017 to 2026
$6.3M
STATISTICAL ISSUES IN AIDS RESEARCHR01AI029168 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI HUGHES, JAMES P · 1989 to 2018
$5.3M
Bayesian Mortality Estimation from Disparate Data SourcesR01HD112421 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI JONATHAN C WAKEFIELD · 2023 to 2026
$1.3M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI029168NIAID NIH HHS R37 AI029168NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD042828NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD112421
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In countries where population census data are limited, generating accurate subnational estimates of health and demographic indicators is challenging. Existing model-based geostatistical methods leverage covariate information and spatial smoothing to reduce the variability of estimates but often ignore the survey design, while traditional small area estimation approaches may not incorporate both unit-level covariate information and spatial smoothing in a design consistent way. We propose a smoothed model-assisted estimator that accounts for survey design and leverages both unit-level covariates and spatial smoothing. Under certain regularity assumptions, this estimator is both design consistent and model consistent. We compare it with existing design-based and model-based estimators using real and simulated data.

Indexed as

Bayesian statisticsmodel-assisted estimationmodel-based geostatisticsPrimary 62P10secondary 62D05small area estimationspatial statistics

Identifiers

PMID39469316
PMCPMC11517617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.