ReviewMaterials today. Bio2024
Programmable biomaterials for bone regeneration.
Review in Materials today. Bio, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Here today, gone tomorrow: the transformative role of biodegradable materials in modern trauma care.EFORT open reviews · 2026Pooled it
- Design and applications of barrier membranes for guided bone regeneration.Bioactive materials · 2026Review
- Current and emerging biomaterials for targeted drug delivery in osteomyelitis management.Discover nano · 2026Review
- Macrophage immunometabolic reprogramming in inflammatory repair failure in osteonecrosis of the femoral head.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2026Review
- Spatiotemporal immunomodulation with programmable biomaterials to promote musculoskeletal tissue regeneration.Bioactive materials · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence Virtual Organoids (AIVOs).Bioactive materials · 2026Review
- Smart biomaterials for cardiovascular, bone, and skin tissue engineering: mechanisms, applications, and future prospects.Journal of biological engineering · 2026Review
- Mechanism-Guided Nanoengineered Therapeutic Peptides for Bone Healing.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Copper-ion releasing LDH nanosheets-hydrogel synergistically enhance subchondral bone repair.Regenerative biomaterials · 2026Article
- Stage-dependent endoplasmic reticulum homeostasis in osteogenic differentiation.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Multimodal data integration in orthopedic regenerative medicine: bridging imaging, omics, and clinical data.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Evolution of Anchor Polymer Systems Used in Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery-A Comprehensive Review.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- The bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells derived migrasomes induced by Titania nanotubes surface serve as chemotaxis effect for osteogenesis.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2025Article
- Advanced therapeutic scaffolds of biomimetic periosteum for functional bone regeneration.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2025Review
- Functionalized zeolite regulates bone metabolic microenvironment.Materials today. Bio · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Programmable biomaterials are distinguished by their ability to adjust properties and functions on demand, in a periodic, reversible, or sequential manner. This contrasts with traditional biomaterials, which undergo irreversible, uncontrolled changes. This review synthesizes key advances in programmable biomaterials, examining their design principles, functionalities and applications in bone regeneration. It charts the transition from traditional to programmable biomaterials, emphasizing their enhanced precision, safety and control, which are critical from clinical and biosafety standpoints. We then classify programmable biomaterials into six types: dynamic nucleic acid-based biomaterials, electrically responsive biomaterials, bioactive scaffolds with programmable properties, nanomaterials for targeted bone regeneration, surface-engineered implants for sequential regeneration and stimuli-responsive release materials. Each category is analyzed for its structural properties and its impact on bone tissue engineering. Finally, the review further concludes by highlighting the challenges faced by programmable biomaterials and suggests integrating artificial intelligence and precision medicine to enhance their application in bone regeneration and other biomedical fields.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.