Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39469310›Full record

ArticlePortuguese journal of public health2022

Contributions to the Portuguese National Plan for Patient Safety 2021-2026: A Robust Methodology Based on the Mixed-Method Approach.

Paulo Sousa, Sofia Guerra Paiva, Maria João Lobão, Ana Luísa Van-Innis, Carla Pereira, Válter Fonseca

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Portuguese journal of public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Development of the National Strategy for Quality of Care and Patient Safety for Greece: co-creation process and lessons learnt.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Sustaining perioperative patient safety improvement: the relevance of patient safety policies and contextual factors in European healthcare systems.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Patient safety culture in nurses' clinical practice.Revista latino-americana de enfermagem · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Paulo SousaPublic Health Research Centre, National School of Public Health, NOVA University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.
Sofia Guerra PaivaPublic Health Research Centre, National School of Public Health, NOVA University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.
Maria João LobãoPublic Health Research Centre, National School of Public Health, NOVA University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.
Ana Luísa Van-InnisPlatform for Continuous Improvement of Quality of Care and Patient Safety (PAQS ASBL), Brussels, Belgium.
Carla PereiraPublic Health Research Centre, National School of Public Health, NOVA University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.
Válter FonsecaDepartment for Quality in Health, Directorate-General of Health, Lisbon, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Several countries prioritize patient safety in their health policies. In Portugal, following the implementation of the National Plan for Patient Safety (NPPS) 2015-2020, the research team of the National School of Public Health (NSPH) carried out extensive work to continue improving aspects of the previous Plan. This work was focused on identifying the strengths and weaknesses of NPPS 2015-2020 and aspects related to its applicability and main challenges and opportunities for the implementation of the NPPS 2021-2026. Methods: Methodological dynamic process was based on the most relevant international and national guidelines and the feedback from key patient safety stakeholders. We developed a cross-sectional mixed-methods study from January to August 2021. We used documentation and periodical reports from National Health Service (NHS) healthcare institutions as secondary sources of information. For primary data collection, we used an online survey (applied to elements in the different quality and safety structures of hospitals and primary care units), interviews, and focus groups to collect information from patient safety experts. Results and Discussion: Strengthening safety culture, patient safety training, communication, leadership involvement, patient and family engagement, and monitorization process is considered essential. We also identified local limitations such as the lack of resources and protected time for the healthcare professionals and lack of leadership involvement on patient safety strategies for dedicating to patient safety actions. Most of the patient safety stakeholders agreed that the safety and health of clinical teams and new modalities of healthcare (such as telemedicine, home hospitalization, home care) should be a priority for patient safety strategies. Conclusions: In our study, we used a robust methodology with a participatory process involving different stakeholders. An alignment between local, regional, and national levels in terms of measuring indicators, the definition of priorities, and actions and activities to improve patient safety is recommended. Reinforced partnerships and alignment between the institution's mission, and safety priorities will be crucial to enhance patient safety. Additionally, this work highlights the added value for health systems achieved through strong partnerships between public administration and academic institutions to improve healthcare quality and patient safety.

Indexed as

Adverse eventsPatient safetyQuality of healthStrategic plan

Identifiers

PMID39469310
PMCPMC11320079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.