ArticleFrontiers in public health2024
Risk factors and prediction model for low-birth-weight infants born to women with gestational diabetes mellitus.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A study on the distribution of high-risk pregnancies and the influencing factors of pregnancy outcomes in Changde City, Hunan Province, China.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2026Article
- Predictors of small-for-gestational-age infants in gestational diabetes mellitus: the impact of metformin use.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2025Article
- Associations of maternal cyclin-dependent kinase 5 regulatory subunit-associated protein 1-like 1(CDKAL1) gene variants with adverse pregnancy outcome in Chinese women.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- Development and validation of a multi-modality system combining radiomics and deep learning for predicting mid-pregnancy complications and enabling timely pregnancy care.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: To explore the risk factors for low-birth-weight infants born to pregnant women with GDM to develop a prediction model and to construct a prediction nomogram for the risk of low birth weight infants born to pregnant women with GDM. Methods: The clinical data of singleton infants diagnosed with gestational diabetes mellitus in Southeast China in 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Gestational conditions and neonatal weight were assessed. Results: A total of 386 diabetic mothers and infants were enrolled, including 193 in the low birth weight group and 193 in the normal birth weight group. The statistically significant factors were age over 36 years (OR = 1.916, 95% CI 1.048-3.505), junior high school education (OR = 4.454, 95% CI 1.882-10.543), history of fetal distress (OR = 0.120, 95% CI 0.016-0.925), gestational hypertension (OR = 3.681, 95% CI 1.357-9.986), preeclampsia (OR = 24.652, 95% CI 5.956-102.036), threatened preterm birth (OR = 18.393, 95% CI 8.457-39.999), triglycerides (OR = 0.642, 95% CI 0.485-0.850), and inadequate gestational weight gain (OR = 1.997, 95% CI 1.162-3.432). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.834 (95% CI: 0.794-0.874, Discussion: This study established a prediction model and risk score for low birth weight in pregnant women with GDM. It helps pregnancy clinics to identify the risk of low birth weight in newborns promptly, in addition to glycemic control and weight management for pregnant women with GDM, and should improve the appropriate treatment plan for pregnant women with higher risk, to provide personalized and precise treatment for pregnant women with GDM and improve infant outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.