ArticleIndian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion2024
Are Healthcare Professionals Adequately Trained for Safe Blood Transfusions? Targeted Training to Bridge Knowledge Gaps.
Article in Indian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Transforming sickle cell haemotherapy in Africa: building safe, antigen-matched, available, and sustainable transfusion pathways.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Ensuring optimal blood transfusion practices relies on a robust expertise base that is indispensable across various professional fields. Recognizing this imperative, the current study aims to assess the knowledge levels of healthcare personnel and enhance transfusion quality through targeted continuing training initiatives. Methods: The preliminary survey was based on an anonymous questionnaire and we used correct response rate (CRR) as the main parameter evaluating the baseline level of knowledge. Then blood transfusion education sessions which focused on transfusion shortcomings were carried out. Finally, we assessed the impact of this training on the baseline education. Results: From the total of 789 questionnaires distributed, we garnered 331 responses 23 from healthcare staff. The overall CRR for questions related to transfusion procedure knowledge was 33%. Notably, the per-transfusion step exhibited the highest control with CRR of 55% while noticeable gaps were observed in the pre-transfusion (CRR = 22%) and post-transfusion (CRR = 13%) phases. Profession wise variations in CRR were evident, with nurses recording the lowest percentage (CRR = 29%) compared to physicians (CRR = 39%) and technicians (CRR = 34%). Substantial differences were observed in the interpretation of Ultimate Control in the Patient's Bed (UCPB) among professions, especially affecting ABO identity, compatibility, and incompatibility cases. Following the blood transfusion training, attended by 105 participants, only 99 participants responded to the questionnaire post-training, expressing high satisfaction with the covered modules (80%). The knowledge enhancement encompassed all transfusion phases and the interpretation of clinical cases, notably ABO compatibility. Overall, there was a significant improvement in CRR from 33 to 53% ( Conclusion: This study demonstrates that the evaluation of knowledge should be carried out on a continuous manner in order to detect gaps in the professional sector and to ensure the effectiveness of training through well-targeted educational programs. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12288-024-01778-y.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.