Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39469168›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion2024

A Comparative Analysis of Freelite and N Latex FLC Assay for the sFLC Measurements in Suspected Patients of Monoclonal Gammopathy.

Manish K Singh, Priyanka Gupta, Kaushal Kumar, Dinesh Chandra, Khaliqur Rahman, Ruchi Gupta, Sanjeev Yadav, Rajesh Kashyap

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Manish K SinghDept. of Hematology, SGPGIMS, Lucknow, India.ORCID 0000-0001-7558-2656
Priyanka GuptaDept. of Hematology, SGPGIMS, Lucknow, India.
Kaushal KumarDept. of Hematology, SGPGIMS, Lucknow, India.
Dinesh ChandraDept. of Hematology, SGPGIMS, Lucknow, India.
Khaliqur RahmanDept. of Hematology, SGPGIMS, Lucknow, India.ORCID 0000-0002-8285-2092
Ruchi GuptaDept. of Hematology, SGPGIMS, Lucknow, India.ORCID 0000-0003-3427-9188
Sanjeev YadavDept. of Hematology, SGPGIMS, Lucknow, India.
Rajesh KashyapDept. of Hematology, SGPGIMS, Lucknow, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the introduction of newer platforms for sFLC estimation, more comparative attempts are required to establish an assay-specific reference range, that can be used in the day-to-day clinical management of the patients, as the revised criteria for the diagnosis of myeloma recommend the use of involved Free light chain (FLC)/uninvolved FLC ratio as myeloma defining event, solely relying on Freelite assay. This was an observational study that included 101 patients, 55 (54.5%) with M-protein (myeloma), and 46 (45.5%) without M-protein. The estimation of the sFLC assay was carried out at two separate platforms, the Freelite Assay (The binding Site, Birmingham, UK) on a Siemens BNII Nephelometer, and the N Latex FLC reagent on Atellica NEPH 630 (Siemens Healthineers, Eschborn, Germany). The comparative correlational analysis of the two assays for estimation of κ-,

Indexed as

MonoclonalM-proteinN Latex assayPolyclonalsFLC

Identifiers

PMID39469168
PMCPMC11513069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.