ArticleIndian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion2024
A Brief Report on Pre-Transfusion Testing in Patients Receiving the Anti-CD38 Monoclonal Antibody for Hematological Disorders in India.
Article in Indian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Determining a safe pre-transfusion protocol for multiple myeloma patients on anti-CD38 treatment.Transfusion medicine (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Absence of Red Blood Cell Alloimmunization in Transfused Patients Receiving Daratumumab: Experience from a Single Center.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Time for newer approach in age-old AIHA: Daratumumab?The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study is to analyze the profile of patients receiving daratumumab and their presentation to the transfusion laboratory by looking at the different pre-transfusion policies and the risk of erythrocyte alloimmunization. Patients receiving daratumumab from 2018 to 2023 were reviewed. They were divided into two groups: Group I, presented before administration of daratumumab, and Group II, presented after drug administration. Appropriate strategies were applied to mitigate the drug interference, and the transfusion outcome was analyzed by following up with the patients for six months. A total of 48 patients were studied. The antibody screen was negative in patients who presented before the administration of daratumumab (n = 35). Extended phenotyping was done for 31 patients. Blood group genotyping was done for 4 patients. The patients who presented after daratumumab administration (n = 13) had a positive antibody screen that became negative with dithiothreitol-treated cells. A total of 261 red cell units were transfused to these patients (mean 5.55 units per patient). None of the patients developed antibodies during the follow-up period. The transfusion services must frame policies and protocols to mitigate drug interference. Good communication between transfusion services and clinical hematologists is a must to ensure safe transfusions. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12288-024-01763-5.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.