Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39469142›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024

Methylene blue therapy in addition to standard treatment for acute-phase septic shock: a pilot randomized controlled trial.

Fabio Luis-Silva, Mayra Gonçalves Menegueti, Leandro Moreira Peres, Corina Dos Reis Sepeda, Maria Cecília Jordani, Fabiola Mestriner, Bruno Cesar Petroski-Moraes, Joaquim Pedro Brito-de-Sousa, Ismael Artur Costa-Rocha, Bruna Lemos Cruz and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Methylene blue in the critical care setting.World journal of critical care medicine · 2025
    Review
  4. Effects of Early Use of Methylene Blue and Vasopressin on Noradrenaline Dose in Septic Shock: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Fabio Luis-SilvaDivision of Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Surgery and Anatomy, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Mayra Gonçalves MeneguetiRibeirão Preto Nursing School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Leandro Moreira PeresDivision of Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Surgery and Anatomy, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Corina Dos Reis SepedaDivision of Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Surgery and Anatomy, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Maria Cecília JordaniDivision of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery and Anatomy, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Fabiola MestrinerDivision of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery and Anatomy, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Bruno Cesar Petroski-MoraesDivision of Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Surgery and Anatomy, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Joaquim Pedro Brito-de-SousaRené Rachou Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, FIOCRUZ-Minas, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Ismael Artur Costa-RochaRené Rachou Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, FIOCRUZ-Minas, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Bruna Lemos CruzDivision of Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Surgery and Anatomy, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Mariana Dermínio DonadelDivision of Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Surgery and Anatomy, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Felipe Barizza de SouzaDivision of Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Surgery and Anatomy, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Gustavo Henrique Martins ReisDivision of Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Surgery and Anatomy, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Fernando Bellissimo-RodriguesDepartment of Social Medicine, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Anibal Basile-FilhoDivision of Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Surgery and Anatomy, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Christiane BecariDepartment of Surgery and Anatomy, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.
Paulo Roberto Barbosa EvoraDivision of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery and Anatomy, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Olindo Assis Martins-FilhoRené Rachou Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, FIOCRUZ-Minas, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Maria Auxiliadora-MartinsDivision of Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Surgery and Anatomy, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Methylene blue (MB) has been used to increase blood pressure in patients with septic shock by acting on guanylate cyclase and nitric oxide synthase. Objective: To determine whether the administration of MB to patients in the initial phase of septic shock leads to a reduction in the use of vasopressors compared to the Control group. Methods: This was a 1:1 randomized clinical trial of two groups (MB and Control). Forty-two patients were included in the present study; 23 patients were allocated to the Control group, and 19 were randomized to the MB group. Both groups had access to standard treatment, consisting of fluid replacement, vasopressors, and antibiotic therapy. Patients received a loading dose of MB (3 mg/kg) and maintenance (0.5 mg/kg/h) for 48 h. Vasopressor doses, laboratory test results, inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokine levels, and hemodynamic monitoring were recorded before the infusion of MB (T1) and after 20 min (T2), 2 h (T3), 24 h (T4), 48 h after the infusion started (T5) and 24 h after weaning (T6). Results: MB therapy was started together with the indication of vasopressin (VAS) as a second vasopressor. The MB group showed an immediate reduction in NOR dosage, an earlier reduction in VAS dosage, and higher IL-10 levels compared to the Control group. Conclusion: Early administration of MB in combination with standard treatment for septic shock might be reduce vasopressors dose. Continuous infusion of MB for 48 h was considered safe and there was no adverse events. These results highlight the potential of MB as a safe adjuvant therapeutic option in the treatment of septic shock. Clinical trial registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/, identifier RBR-96584w4.

Indexed as

cytokineslactatemethylene bluenitric oxidenorepinephrineseptic shockvasopressinvasopressors

Identifiers

PMID39469142
PMCPMC11514138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.