Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39469140›Full record

ArticleResuscitation plus2024

Pre-assembled ECMO: Enhancing efficiency and reducing stress in refractory cardiac arrest care.

Tharusan Thevathasan, Sonia Lech, Andreas Diefenbach, Elisa Bechthold, Tim Gaßmann, Sebastian Fester, Georg Girke, Wulf Knie, Benjamin T Lukusa, Sebastian Kühn and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Resuscitation plus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The Heart Team approach to cardiac arrest.European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Article
  4. Editorial: Extracorporeal cardio-pulmonary resuscitation (ECPR).Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Tharusan ThevathasanDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité (DHZC), Campus Benjamin Franklin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203 Berlin, Germany.
Sonia LechDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Mitte, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany.
Andreas DiefenbachDZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), partner site Berlin, Potsdamer Str. 58, 10785 Berlin, Germany.
Elisa BechtholdDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité (DHZC), Campus Benjamin Franklin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203 Berlin, Germany.
Tim GaßmannDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité (DHZC), Campus Benjamin Franklin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203 Berlin, Germany.
Sebastian FesterDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité (DHZC), Campus Benjamin Franklin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203 Berlin, Germany.
Georg GirkeDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité (DHZC), Campus Benjamin Franklin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203 Berlin, Germany.
Wulf KnieDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité (DHZC), Campus Benjamin Franklin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203 Berlin, Germany.
Benjamin T LukusaDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité (DHZC), Campus Benjamin Franklin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203 Berlin, Germany.
Sebastian KühnLabor Berlin - Charité Vivantes Services GmbH, Sylter Straße 2, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
Steffen DeschHeart Center Leipzig at the University of Leipzig, Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, Germany.
Ulf LandmesserDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité (DHZC), Campus Benjamin Franklin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203 Berlin, Germany.
Carsten SkurkDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité (DHZC), Campus Benjamin Franklin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203 Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) by veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) during refractory cardiac arrest presents significant medical and psychological challenges for healthcare providers. Beyond managing cardiac arrest and preparing for potential coronary angiography, the ECMO circuit must be assembled and primed under strictly sterile conditions, contributing to additional psychological stress and potential delays in ECMO cannulation. This pragmatic study thought to evaluate whether pre-assembled and pre-primed ECMO circuits (pre-primed group) maintain sterility over a 21-day period, expedite ECMO initiation in ECPR patients and alleviate the psychological burden on the ECPR team, compared to newly assembled and primed ECMO circuits (on-demand group). Methods: In a prospective manner, ECMO circuits were either pre-assembled and pre-primed under sterile conditions, maintained for 21 days with culture samples taken every seventh day, or newly assembled and primed during the acute emergency situation. The transition from on-demand assembly and priming of ECMO circuits to pre-primed ECMO circuits occurred on January 1st, 2021. The interval between patients' arrival in the cardiac catheterization laboratory and the initiation of ECMO was recorded and retrospectively compared between the two treatment groups. The ECPR team, comprising experienced cardiologists and nurses, was prospectively surveyed using the modified Perceived Stress Questionnaire (PSQ-20). Results: All aseptically pre-assembled and pre-primed ECMO circuits demonstrated sterile cultures for aerobic and anaerobic microorganisms as well as fungal agents over the 21-day period: 0/120 positive cultures (0 %, 95 % CI for binomial probability 0-0.03). The time to ECMO initiation was significantly reduced in the pre-primed group compared to the on-demand group: 13 [IQR 9-17] versus 31 [IQR 27-44] minutes, P < 0.001. Responses from ECPR physicians and nurses on the PSQ-20 were similar across all items. With the use of pre-primed ECMO circuits, all ECPR professionals reported a greater sense of settled inner feeling, considerably less psychological tension, fewer worries and insecurities, as well as more effective ICU shifts with improved personal goal achievement. However, treating ECPR patients with pre-primed ECMO circuits did not lead to increased job satisfaction or higher physical energy levels. Conclusion: Aseptically pre-assembled and pre-primed ECMO circuits maintain sterility for multiple weeks, significantly reducing ECMO initiation times and alleviating psychological strain on the ECPR team. Consequently, implementing these circuits in ECPR centers could enhance both patient outcomes and healthcare provider well-being.

Indexed as

Cardiac arrestExtracorporeal cardio-pulmonary resuscitationHygienePsychologic stressVeno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

Identifiers

PMID39469140
PMCPMC11513517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.