Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39469130›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2024

Machine learning-based prediction of mortality in acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock.

Qitian Zhang, Lizhen Xu, Zhiyi Xie, Weibin He, Xiaohong Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Qitian Zhang *Department of Cardiology, Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Zhangzhou, Fujian, China.
Lizhen Xu *Department of Endocrinology, Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou University Affiliated Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Zhiyi XieDepartment of Cardiology, Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Zhangzhou, Fujian, China.
Weibin HeDepartment of Cardiology, Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Zhangzhou, Fujian, China.
Xiaohong HuangDepartment of Cardiology, Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Zhangzhou, Fujian, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In the ICU, patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS) often face high mortality rates, making timely and precise mortality risk prediction crucial for clinical decision-making. Despite existing models, machine learning algorithms hold the potential for improved predictive accuracy. Methods: In this study, a predictive model was developed using the MIMIC-IV database, with external validation performed on the eICU-CRD database. We included ICU patients diagnosed with AMI-CS. Feature selection was conducted using the Boruta algorithm, followed by the construction and comparison of four machine learning models: Logistic Regression (LR), eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Adaptive Boosting (AdaBoost), and Gaussian Naive Bayes (GNB). Model performance was evaluated based on metrics such as AUC (Area Under the Curve), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and so on. The SHAP method was employed to visualize and interpret the importance of model features. Finally, we constructed an online prediction model and conducted external validation in the eICU-CRD database. Results: In this study, a total of 570 and 391 patients with AMI-CS were included from the MIMIC-IV and eICU-CRD databases, respectively. Among all machine learning algorithms evaluated, LR exhibited the best performance with a validation set AUC of 0.841(XGBoost: 0.835, AdaBoost: 0.839, GNB: 0.826). The model incorporated five variables: prothrombin time, blood urea nitrogen, age, beta-blockers and Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors or Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers. SHAP plots are employed to visualize the importance of model features and to interpret the results. An online prediction tool was developed, externally validated with the eICU-CRD database, achieving an AUC of 0.755. Conclusion: Employing the LR algorithm, we developed a predictive model for assessing the mortality risk among AMI-CS patients in the ICU setting. Through model predictions, this facilitates early detection of high-risk individuals, ensures judicious allocation of healthcare resources.

Indexed as

acute myocardial infarctioncardiogenic shockeICU-CRDhospital mortalitymachine learningMIMIC-IV

Identifiers

PMID39469130
PMCPMC11513311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.