ArticleFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2024
PD-1 inhibitor sintilimab treated patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer.
Article in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a highly challenging subtype due to a unique tumor microenvironment. Several evidence (IMpassion130 trial and KEYNOTE-355 trial) supported the therapeutic effect of the immune checkpoint inhibitor in TNBC. However, the efficacy and safety of the PD-1 inhibitor sintilimab in breast cancer (BC) has not been well-investigated. So the real-world data on sintilimab-treated patients with metastatic BC were collected and analyzed in this study. Methods: The patients were eligible according to the requirements included: ages between 18 years and 75 years; recurrent or metastatic TNBC; measurable disease based on RECIST v1.1; no limitation on the prior systemic treatments; and ECOG performance status of 0-1. Patients received sintilimab 200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression. Results: From 1 June 2019 to 1 October 2022, 40 female patients (median age, 55.5 years) with metastatic TNBC (mTNBC) were enrolled into the study. The median prior lines of systemic therapy for mTNBC was three (range, 1-8), with 60% of cases receiving at least three lines of therapy for metastatic disease. The visceral or brain metastasis was detected in 40.4% or 9.6% of patients, respectively. The median duration of response was 2.8 months (range, 0.7-21.0), and the median number of sintilimab doses administered was 4 (range, 1-30). The ORR and DCR were 22.5% and 72.5%, separately. The median PFS was 3.5 months (range, 1.4-21.0), with a 6-month PFS rate of 15.0% (6/40). The median OS was 52.5 months (range, 9.0-247.0) as of data cut-off. Common adverse effects were acceptable, and fatigue, skin rash, and pruritus were the frequent toxicity observed. Two cases of grade 3 curable adverse events were considered to be treatment-related. PD-L1-positive tumor was found in 40% cases (4/10) of mTNBC. Although statistical difference was not reached, the trend was obvious. Patients with PD-L1-positive tumor gained better treatment response, while the TMB-high carrier received more benefits of PFS and OS. Conclusion: In our study, preliminary evidence provided the anticancer activity and acceptable adverse effects of sintilimab administered every 3 weeks to pretreated patients with mTNBC. Sintilimab showed its efficacy and safety of immunotherapy for patients with advanced TNBC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.