ArticleThe journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global2024
Distinguishing DRESS syndrome from drug rash and eosinophilia: Beyond RegiSCAR criteria.
Article in The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- New Insights Into Immunomodulatory Strategies for Drug Hypersensitivity Reactions: An EAACI Task Force Report.Clinical and translational allergy · 2026Review
- A Narrative Review of Drug-Induced Haemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis: A Rare but Relevant Differential Diagnosis.International archives of allergy and immunology · 2026Review
- The utility of rituximab in patients with eosinophilic fasciitis: case series from an Australian tertiary multidisciplinary clinic.Clinical rheumatology · 2026Article
- Rash and edema shortly after initial exposure to low dose cenobamate.Epilepsy & behavior reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Diagnosing drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) can be challenging. Objectives: We sought to identify clinical and laboratory features outside of the Registry of Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reaction (RegiSCAR) criteria that distinguish patients with probable DRESS (RegiSCAR ≥ 4) from those with drug rash and eosinophilia (DRE). Methods: Using international coding classifications of drug-induced fever, generalized skin eruption due to medications, and eosinophilia, a retrospective audit from 2008 to 2023 of hospitalized patients was performed. Results: Forty-four cases of DRESS were compared to 80 cases of DRE. In addition to the RegiSCAR distinguishing factors for DRESS were longer drug latency before symptom onset (median 21 vs 5 days, Conclusion: In this large study evaluating DRE patients whose disease does not meet the RegiSCAR criteria for DRESS, we found that additional factors outside the RegiSCAR criteria may help clinicians differentiate DRESS, which is critical for optimal and timely patient management. Our study also highlights the need for development of local protocols to ensure appropriate allergy labeling and testing are performed to prevent recurrent DRESS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.