ArticleInternational journal of pharmaceutics: X2024
Effect of wound dressing porosity and exudate viscosity on the exudate absorption:
Article in International journal of pharmaceutics: X, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- A double-layer scaffold composed of 3D bioprinted layer of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor and electrospun nanofibers of abietic acid for full thickness skin repair.International journal of pharmaceutics: X · 2026Article
- Advanced Nanomaterials for Chronic Wounds: M.O.I.S.T. Concept-Driven Design Strategy.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Review
- Structure-Function Engineering of Hydrogel-MOF Polymer Composites for Regenerative Wound Dressings with Emerging Antiviral Biointerface Functions.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Development of Antiseptic and Epidermal Growth Factor Co-Loaded Thermoresponsive Composite Hydrogel for Wound Healing: Fabrication, Characterization, and In Vitro Functional Assessment.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Freeze-Dried Chitosan Scaffolds Containing Grape Seed Oil for Wound Healing Applications.ACS omega · 2025Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Exudate absorption is a key parameter for proper wound dressing performance. Unlike standardized tests that consider exudate viscosity close to that of water, patients' exudates vary greatly in composition and, therefore, viscosity. This work aimed to investigate the effects of exudate viscosity and pore size of hydrogel-like dressings on the exudate absorption rate to establish rational criteria for the design of dressings that can meet the personalized needs of wound treatment. Computer-aided design (CAD) was used for Digital Light Processing (DLP) 3D printing of hydrogels with 0%, 30% and 60% porosity. The hydrogels were characterized in detail, and the absorption of two simulated exudate fluids (SEFs) was video-recorded. The same CAD files were used to develop
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.