ArticleFrontiers in neurology2024
Exploring bispectral index as an alternative to polysomnography for long-term sleep monitoring in disorders of consciousness.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- In-laboratory polysomnography as the reference standard in sleep research: a bibliometric overview of human studies.Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Sleep plays a crucial role in neuroplasticity and recovery from brain injury, particularly in disorders of consciousness (DoC), including unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (UWS) and minimally conscious state (MCS). Traditional sleep monitoring methods like polysomnography (PSG) are complex and often impractical for long-term use in clinical settings. Target: This study aimed to explore the utility of the Bispectral Index (BIS) as a more practical alternative for monitoring sleep patterns in DoC patients. Methods: We conducted simultaneous PSG and BIS monitoring on 38 DoC patients (19 UWS and 19 MCS). The study focused on analyzing sleep timing distribution, the effectiveness of BIS in differentiating sleep stages, and its correlation with consciousness levels. Results: Our findings revealed that DoC patients exhibited irregular and fragmented sleep patterns, necessitating extended monitoring periods. The BIS effectively differentiated various sleep stages, with significant differences in BIS values observed across these stages. However, BIS values did not show significant differences between UWS and MCS patients, indicating that BIS primarily indicates wakefulness rather than cognitive awareness. DoC patients have disturbed sleep-wake cycles that require prolonged monitoring. BIS can well distinguish sleep stages in DoC patients, and the distribution of values is similar to that of normal subjects. However, BIS could not distinguish the level of consciousness of DoC patients. Conclusion: The study demonstrates the potential of BIS as a practical tool for long-term sleep monitoring in DoC patients, offering a less intrusive alternative to traditional methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.