Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39469071›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2024

Efgartigimod treatment for generalized myasthenia gravis: a single-center case series of 16 patients.

Toshiya Nomura, Michie Imamura, Masao Imura, Hironori Mizutani, Mitsuharu Ueda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Heterogeneous response to efgartigimod in real-world experience with myasthenia gravis: Predictors and treatment strategies.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. New and Emerging Biological Therapies for Myasthenia Gravis: A Focussed Review for Clinical Decision-Making.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Toshiya NomuraDepartment of Neurology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Michie ImamuraDepartment of Neurology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Masao ImuraDepartment of Neurology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Hironori MizutaniDepartment of Neurology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Mitsuharu UedaDepartment of Neurology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Efgartigimod was approved in Japan in January 2022 for the treatment of generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG), regardless of antibody status. This case series describes a real-world experience in Japan of efgartigimod treatment for gMG patients with diverse backgrounds. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 16 Japanese patients (11 females and five males, mean age 40.4 years) with gMG who received efgartigimod at the Kumamoto University Hospital between August 2022 and September 2023. The outcomes were Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) responders (≥ 3 point reduction), IgG levels, and change in prednisolone dose, in the first cycle of efgartigimod. Results: Fifteen patients completed one cycle of efgartigimod. Of the 14 patients for whom QMG scores were obtained, 10 patients were QMG responders. Four of the five patients with Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America class V were QMG responders. Improvement in QMG after efgartigimod treatment was observed in one patient with myasthenic crisis and in one refractory patient who had unsuccessful eculizumab treatment. The mean reductions from baseline in IgG levels at weeks 1, 2, 3, and follow-up were 38.3, 56.1, 63.1, and 43.9%, respectively. A decrease in prednisolone dose was observed in seven patients. The most common adverse events were headache (three patients) and diarrhea (two patients). One patient discontinued efgartigimod treatment due to a treatment-related adverse event of rash. Conclusion: Improvements in the outcomes of patients with gMG, including patients with severe gMG, myasthenic crisis, and refractory to anti-complementary therapy, were observed after the first cycle of efgartigimod treatment. Our real-world experience in Japan suggests the future possibilities for the treatment with efgartigimod for gMG with diverse backgrounds.

Indexed as

autoimmune diseasescase seriesefgartigimod alfamyasthenia gravisneonatal Fc receptor

Identifiers

PMID39469071
PMCPMC11514137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.